HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Time of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Start in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and the Likelihood of a Drug-Free Remission in Young Adulthood.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To study juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) long-term outcomes in relation to the time of initiation of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD).
METHODS:
Outcomes of JIA patients prospectively followed by the Biologika in der Kinderrheumatologie (BiKeR) and Juvenile Arthritis Methotrexate/Biologics Long-Term Observation (JuMBO) registers were analyzed with regard to drug-free remission and inactive disease, functional status and quality of life, and surgery. To analyze the influence of early bDMARD therapy on outcomes, patients were assigned to 3 groups based on the time from symptom onset to bDMARD start (G1: ≤2 years, G2: >2 to ≤5 years, and G3: >5 years). Propensity score-adjusted outcome differences were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression analyses among the groups.
RESULTS:
A total of 701 JIA patients were observed for mean ± SD 9.1 ± 3.7 years. At the last follow-up (disease duration mean ± SD 14.3 ± 6.1 years), 11.7% of patients were in drug-free remission, and 40.0% had inactive disease. More than half of the patients reported no functional limitation, while 5% had undergone arthroplasty, and 3% had eye surgery. At the 10-year time point, patients in G1 (n = 108) were significantly more likely to be in drug-free remission than those patients who began treatment later (G2, n = 199; G3, n = 259), with 18.5%, 10.1%, and 4.9%, respectively. Patients in G1 had significantly lower disease activity (clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints = 4.9), a better overall well-being (18.2% patient global assessment score = 0), and higher functional status (59.2% Health Assessment Questionnaire score = 0), compared to patients in G3 (7.1, 8.4%, and 43.7%, respectively). G1 patients required arthroplasty significantly less frequently than G3 patients and had significantly lower disease activity over time than patients in both G2 and G3.
CONCLUSION:
Early DMARD treatment is associated with better disease control and outcomes, which supports the concept of a "window of opportunity" for JIA.
AuthorsKirsten Minden, Gerd Horneff, Martina Niewerth, Eva Seipelt, Martin Aringer, Peer Aries, Ivan Foeldvari, Johannes-Peter Haas, Ariane Klein, Stefanie Tatsis, Klaus Tenbrock, Angela Zink, Jens Klotsche
JournalArthritis care & research (Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)) Vol. 71 Issue 4 Pg. 471-481 (04 2019) ISSN: 2151-4658 [Electronic] United States
PMID30044538 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.
Chemical References
  • Antirheumatic Agents
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Antirheumatic Agents (administration & dosage)
  • Arthritis, Juvenile (drug therapy, surgery)
  • Child
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Remission, Spontaneous
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: