METHODS AND RESULTS: The
MEMS-HF population (n = 239) was separated by the use of
sacubitril/valsartan (n = 68) or no use of it (n = 164). Utilization of
diuretics and their doses was prespecified in the protocol and was monitored in both groups. Multivariable regression, ANCOVA, and a generalized linear model were used to fit baseline covariates with
furosemide equivalents and changes for 12 months.
MEMS-HF participants (n = 239) were grouped in
sacubitril/valsartan users [n = 68, 64 ± 11 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 25 ± 9%, cardiac index (CI) 1.89 ± 0.4 L/min/m2 ] vs. non-users (n = 164, 70 ± 10 years, LVEF 36 ± 16%, CI 2.11 ± 0.58 L/min/m2 , P = 0.0002, P < 0.0001, and P = 0.0015, respectively). In contrast, mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) values were comparable between groups (29 ± 11 vs. 31 ± 11 mmHg, P = 0.127). Utilization of
loop diuretics was lower in patients taking
sacubitril/valsartan compared with those without (P = 0.01). Significant predictor of
loop diuretic use was a history of
renal failure (P = 0.005) but not age (P = 0.091). After subjects were stratified by
sacubitril/valsartan or other
diuretic use, PAP was nominally, but not significantly lower in
sacubitril/valsartan-treated patients (baseline: P = 0.52; 6 months: P = 0.07; 12 months: P = 0.53), while there was no difference in outcome or PAP changes. This difference was observed despite lower CI (P = 0.0015). Comparable changes were not observed for other non-
loop diuretics (P = 0.21).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients whose treatment was guided by remote PAP monitoring, concomitant use of
sacubitril/valsartan was associated with reduced utilization of
loop diuretics, which could potentially be relevant for outcomes.