Pain experience in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with anti-TNF agents compared to non-biologic standard treatment.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Anti-TNF agents have proven efficacy in children with severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who are unresponsive to standard therapy. Therefore pain reduction or elimination could be expected. The aim of this study was to compare the pain experience in children with JIA treated with anti-TNF agents (n = 41) or non-biologic standard treatment (n = 50).

METHODS:

All children completed a 2-week pain diary and, for children treated with anti-TNF agents, measures of pain-coping and pain-specific beliefs. Parents rated the child's level of functional disability. Clinical data were collected from the pediatric rheumatologists.

RESULTS:

No significant differences were found between the anti-TNF group and non-biologic standard treatment group for average pain score, number of children with daily pain reported in the pain diary, or level of functional disability. Significantly more children in the anti-TNF group reported no pain at all. Children undergoing standard treatment had significantly higher disease activity. Significant differences were found between the high pain patients treated with anti-TNF agents and the rest of the anti-TNF group in regards to their pain-specific beliefs of disability and harm, and the pain-coping strategy of catastrophizing.

CONCLUSION:

These results indicate that a great proportion of children treated with anti-TNF agents respond well to the treatment in regards to disease activity and pain, but pain was still a problem for a subgroup of children though they were in remission with biological agents. More focus on pain management is needed.

• Authors: Johanne Jeppesen Lomholt, Mikael Thastum, Troels Herlin
• Journal: Pediatric rheumatology online journal (Pediatr Rheumatol Online J) Vol. 11 Issue 1 Pg. 21 (May 06 2013) ISSN: 1546-0096 [Print] England
• PMID: 23641813 (Publication Type: Journal Article)