Provocation studies in the diagnosis of occupational asthma.

Abstract

Specific and nonspecific provocation studies, although not always essential for diagnosing OA, help confirm the diagnosis and identify the offending agent. Nonspecific bronchial challenge testing is used to detect airway hyperresponsiveness and to clarify the nature of the patient's symptoms. Pharmacologic bronchoconstrictor agents (eg, methacholine, histamine) most commonly are used for the challenge, but nonisotonic aerosols, exercise and hyperventilation also can show airway hyperresponsiveness. Nonspecific challenges usually are done in the laboratory, but can be done at the workplace if emergency equipment is available. A comparison of results obtained at and away from the workplace (at least 1 week apart) may be helpful in diagnosing OA. Specific bronchial challenge testing is considered the gold standard for OA diagnosis. It can be crucial in helping physicians, employers, and employees make decisions about continued employment, compensation, career changes, and treatment. Testing can pinpoint new industrial agents that cause OA, enabling dissemination of information on its hazards to the public and within the industry. The nature of the agent determines the type of protocol that is used for testing. Agents can be in the form of dusts, powders, aerosols, vapors gases, and animal dander. Exposure can be as simple as having patients simulate their work activities, or as complicated as using special challenge chambers with controlled environments and precise delivery of agents. Performing control challenges with a component that is separate from the test agent is essential to avoid false-positive results. The timing, duration, and dosing of exposure depend on the type of reaction that has been experienced previously, the nature of the agent, and the patient's baseline airway hyperresponsiveness. Serial spirometry and observation often are done for up to 8 hours to monitor early and late reactions. SBC testing should be performed in the proper medical setting in which emergency equipment available and should be administered only by healthcare personnel who are trained and experienced in the procedures. Safety of the patient is the primary consideration.

• Authors: Ricardo A Tan, Sheldon L Spector
• Journal: Immunology and allergy clinics of North America (Immunol Allergy Clin North Am) Vol. 23 Issue 2 Pg. 251-67 (May 2003) ISSN: 0889-8561 [Print] United States
• PMID: 12803362 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)

Topics

• Asthma (diagnosis)
• Humans
• Nasal Provocation Tests (methods)
• Occupational Diseases (diagnosis)