HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Radiological and clinical results of longterm treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate and azathioprine.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To study whether the reported superior effect of methotrexate (MTX) compared to azathioprine (AZA) in retarding radiologic progression after one year in rheumatoid arthritis was sustained at 2 and 4 years.
METHODS:
All 64 patients enrolled in the original randomized double blind study were invited for an open extension of followup to 4 years including 4-monthly clinical and laboratory assessments and radiographs of hands, wrists, and feet at 2 and 4 years.
RESULTS:
After 4 years, 18 patients (58%) from the MTX group and 7 patients (21%) from the AZA group continued the initial study drug. During followup more patients (n = 21) switched from AZA to MTX than vice versa (n = 5). In an intention-to-treat analysis improvement of clinical and laboratory variables at 4 years was more pronounced in the MTX group. Mean radiologic scores increased in both treatment groups during followup. According to an intention-to-treat analysis increase in erosion score at one and 2 years in the MTX group was significantly lower than in the AZA group: after one year MTX group 1.8 versus AZA group 5.3 (p = 0.002); after 2 years MTX 3.5 versus AZA 6.5 (p = 0.05). After 4 years there was a trend toward less progression in the MTX group: MTX 6.8 versus AZA 10.8 (p = 0.09). For the total score, progression in the MTX group was less after one and 2 years. After 4 years marked radiologic progression was observed more often in the AZA group.
CONCLUSION:
Drug continuation after 4 years of followup was better for MTX than for AZA. In an intention-to-treat analysis the beneficial effect of MTX on radiologic progression compared with AZA was sustained after 2 years of followup. Thereafter differences between treatment groups leveled off, probably mainly due to the greater number of switches from AZA to MTX than vice versa.
AuthorsP J Kerstens, A M Boerbooms, M E Jeurissen, R de Graaf, J Mulder, L B van de Putte
JournalThe Journal of rheumatology (J Rheumatol) Vol. 27 Issue 5 Pg. 1148-55 (May 2000) ISSN: 0315-162X [Print] Canada
PMID10813280 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
  • Azathioprine
  • Methotrexate
Topics
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid (diagnostic imaging, drug therapy, surgery)
  • Azathioprine (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Methotrexate (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiography
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: