Abstract | BACKGROUND/AIMS: METHODOLOGY: RESULTS:
Stent insertion was technically successful in all cases and led to a reduction of dysphagia. Risk of perforation was comparable in both groups (n = 1 in each group). Most of the plastic stents were placed when the tumor was localized in the proximal part of the esophagus close to the upper esophageal sphincter, when esophageal- bronchial fistula was present and in the risk of fistula development after radiation. During follow-up, tumor ingrowth (TI) and stent migration (SM) were the major complications. Whereas tumor ingrowth predominantly occurred in metal stents (TI after 6 weeks, 45% vs. SM, 10%) that required repeated argon beamer therapy, tube migration and bolus impaction (BI) often occurred in patients with plastic stents (TI, 0% vs. SM, 16%; BI, 4%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study suggest that the decision whether plastic tubes or metal stents used should be taken individually considering tumor localization, axis deviation and the presence of esophago-respiratory fistulas. When stepwise dilation of malignant stenoses is performed carefully, perforation risk appears not to be different between placement of plastic prostheses and metal stents.
|
Authors | B Schumacher, H Lübke, T Frieling, D Haussinger, C Niederau |
Journal | Hepato-gastroenterology
(Hepatogastroenterology)
1998 May-Jun
Vol. 45
Issue 21
Pg. 755-60
ISSN: 0172-6390 [Print] Greece |
PMID | 9684128
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Bronchial Fistula
- Deglutition Disorders
(etiology)
- Esophageal Fistula
- Esophageal Neoplasms
(complications)
- Esophageal Stenosis
(complications, etiology, therapy)
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Metals
- Middle Aged
- Palliative Care
- Plastics
- Stents
|