HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Combination chemotherapy of the epipodophyllotoxin derivatives, teniposide and etoposide. A pharmacodynamic rationale?

Abstract
Previous studies in vitro on the influence of extracellular protein binding of Teniposide (VM26) and Etoposide (VP16-213) on subsequent cellular uptake by experimental murine tumor cells [Cancer Res 38:2549 (1978); Drug Metab Rev 8:119 (1978)] suggested that a timed-sequential combination of VM26 and VP16-213 may increase the bioavailability of VP16-213. This was studied clinically in six cancer patients with ascites (five ovarian, one rectal) whereby VM26 (20 mg/m2) was given i.p. 2 h prior to VP16-213 (100 mg/m2; i.p.) In some patients, this regimen was administered i.v. The i.v. regimen was found to be more toxic (myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting) than i.p. regimen at same doses of drugs. Several patients remained stable to disease during 1-2 courses of therapy (3 weeks per course), one patient had partial remission, and has been stable in her disease for more than 4 months. In two patients, plasma and ascites fluid was analyzed for VP16-213 and VM26 by a new reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography method. Both VM26 and VP16-213 could be eluted isocratically (28% v/v acetonitrile in water) from a c18 column with retention times of 6.6 and 13.3 min, respectively. Subsequent pharmacokinetic analysis of one patient suggests that protein binding displacement of VP16-213 in plasma and perhaps ascites fluid increased the pharmacokinetic volume of distribution (28 l) and reduced the elimination half-life (12 h). The data suggests that VP16-213 is distributed more widely in the body and is represented by a single compartment pharmacokinetic model. Analysis of VM26 in ascites and plasma suggests that the so-called "deep pharmacokinetic compartment" represents ascites equivalent space and that the plasma concentration represents VM26 as free and protein-bound drug in kinetic distinguishable compartments. Determinants of drug action are potentially composed of a multiplicity of physiological, biochemical, and other factors. The potential for manipulating the pharmacodynamic properties of drugs to achieve greater therapeutic potential needs further study.
AuthorsL M Allen, F Tejada, A D Okonmah, S Nordqvist
JournalCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology (Cancer Chemother Pharmacol) Vol. 7 Issue 2-3 Pg. 151-6 ( 1982) ISSN: 0344-5704 [Print] Germany
PMID7083456 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Etoposide
  • Teniposide
  • Podophyllotoxin
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Ascitic Fluid (metabolism)
  • Drug Interactions
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Etoposide (administration & dosage, metabolism)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kinetics
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Biological
  • Podophyllotoxin (analogs & derivatives)
  • Protein Binding
  • Teniposide (administration & dosage, metabolism)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: