Comparative effectiveness of different primary vaccination courses on mRNA-based booster vaccines against SARs-COV-2 infections: a time-varying cohort analysis using trial emulation in the Virus Watch community cohort.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The Omicron B.1.1.529 variant increased severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in doubly vaccinated individuals, particularly in the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (ChAdOx1) recipients. To tackle infections, the UK's booster vaccination programmes used messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines irrespective of an individual's primary course vaccine type, and prioritized the clinically vulnerable. These mRNA vaccines included the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273). There is limited understanding of the effectiveness of different primary vaccination courses on mRNA booster vaccines against SARs-COV-2 infections and how time-varying confounders affect these evaluations.

METHODS:

Trial emulation was applied to a prospective community observational cohort in England and Wales to reduce time-varying confounding-by-indication driven by prioritizing vaccination based upon age, vulnerability and exposure. Trial emulation was conducted by meta-analysing eight adult cohort results whose booster vaccinations were staggered between 16 September 2021 and 05 January 2022 and followed until 23 January 2022. Time from booster vaccination until SARS-CoV-2 infection, loss of follow-up or end of study was modelled using Cox proportional hazard models and adjusted for age, sex, minority ethnic status, clinically vulnerability and deprivation.

RESULTS:

A total of 19 159 participants were analysed, with 11 709 ChAdOx1 primary courses and 7450 BNT162b2 primary courses. Median age, clinical vulnerability status and infection rates fluctuate through time. In mRNA-boosted adults, 7.4% (n = 863) of boosted adults with a ChAdOx1 primary course experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with 7.7% (n = 571) of those who had BNT162b2 as a primary course. The pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 1.01 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of: 0.90 to 1.13.

CONCLUSION:

After an mRNA booster dose, we found no difference in protection comparing those with a primary course of BNT162b2 with those with a ChAdOx1 primary course. This contrasts with pre-booster findings where previous research shows greater effectiveness of BNT162b2 than ChAdOx1 in preventing infection.

• Authors: Vincent Grigori Nguyen, Alexei Yavlinsky, Sarah Beale, Susan Hoskins, Thomas E Byrne, Vasileios Lampos, Isobel Braithwaite, Wing Lam Erica Fong, Ellen Fragaszy, Cyril Geismar, Jana Kovar, Annalan M D Navaratnam, Parth Patel, Madhumita Shrotri, Sophie Weber, Andrew C Hayward, Robert W Aldridge
• Journal: International journal of epidemiology (Int J Epidemiol) Vol. 52 Issue 2 Pg. 342-354 (04 19 2023) ISSN: 1464-3685 [Electronic] England
• PMID: 36655537 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
• Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Chemical References

• 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273
• BNT162 Vaccine
• COVID-19 Vaccines
• RNA, Messenger

Topics

• Adult
• Humans
• 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273
• BNT162 Vaccine
• COVID-19 (prevention & control)
• COVID-19 Vaccines
• Prospective Studies
• RNA, Messenger
• SARS-CoV-2
• Vaccination