Abstract | PURPOSE: METHODS: A comparative treatment planning study was performed on 14 patients, and the results were compared according to conventional dose-volume metrics. In addition, estimates of the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer induction were determined for the bowel, the bladder and the rectum. For the ovaries, the risk of ovarian failure was estimated. RESULTS: The dosimetric findings demonstrate the equivalence between VMAT and IMPT in terms of target coverage. A statistically significant reduction of the mean and near-to-maximum doses was proven for the organs at risk. The EAR ratio estimated for IMPT to VMAT was 0.51 ± 0.32, 0.32 ± 0.35 and 0.05 ± 0.11 for the bowel, bladder and rectum, respectively. Concerning the risk of ovarian failure for the chronologic age ranging from 18 to 46 years, the expected net loss in fertility years ranged from 4.8 to 3.0 years for protons and 12.0 to 5.7 years for photons. CONCLUSION: This in-silico study confirmed the beneficial role of IMPT from a dosimetric point of view. Mathematical models suggested that the use of protons might be further advantageous due to the expected reduction of the risk of secondary cancer induction and its milder impact on the reduction of fertility.
|
Authors | Johannes Rosenbrock, Christian Baues, Andres Vasquez-Torres, Alessandro Clivio, Antonella Fogliata, Peter Borchmann, Simone Marnitz, Luca Cozzi |
Journal | Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
(Acta Oncol)
Vol. 61
Issue 1
Pg. 81-88
(Jan 2022)
ISSN: 1651-226X [Electronic] England |
PMID | 34596491
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Female
- Hodgkin Disease
(radiotherapy)
- Humans
- Organs at Risk
- Proton Therapy
(adverse effects)
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
(adverse effects)
|