HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Immediate clinical benefits of combining therapeutic exercise and interferential therapy in adults with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Therapeutic exercise (TE) is highly recommended for the management of non-specific neck pain (NSNP) and has shown promising results combined with interferential current therapy. Yet, the clinical relevance of the pooled effect of these approaches remains uncertain.
AIM:
To investigate the immediate clinical effect size of combining TE and interferential therapy, compared with the isolated use of TE, in adults with chronic NSNP.
DESIGN:
Randomized, single-blinded, controlled, superiority trial.
SETTING:
Outpatients, primary care center.
POPULATION:
Forty-nine adults with chronic NSNP.
METHODS:
Participants with neck pain (grades I or II) lasting for more than 12 weeks were allocated to a TE plus interferential currents group (N.=25) or to a TE only group (N.=24). All individuals underwent treatment 5 times a week for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was current neck pain intensity (11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes included neck disability (Neck Disability Index) and active cervical range-of-movement (CROM device). Measurements were taken at baseline and immediately after treatment. An intention-to-treat analysis was carried out. To quantify the effect size of the interventions, the relative risk, the absolute and relative risk reduction, and the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated.
RESULTS:
A significant time*group effect was found for pain intensity, disability, and neck flexion and right rotation (all, P<0.05). In the analysis for treatment benefit, the NNT was 2 (95% CI: 2 to 4, P<0.001) for neck pain and disability, and 3 (95% CI: 2 to 11, P=0.029) for neck flexion.
CONCLUSIONS:
Adding interferential therapy to TE is clinically more effective than TE alone to immediately improve neck pain and disability, but not active cervical range-of-movement, in adults with persistent neck pain.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT:
Our results suggest that this multimodal intervention can be a useful strategy for rehabilitation of patients with NSNP. This is the first study on this topic reporting findings in terms of clinical relevance, which is key to transfer research evidence into practice.
AuthorsManuel Albornoz-Cabello, Cristo J Barrios-Quinta, Luis Espejo-Antúnez, Isabel Escobio-Prieto, María J Casuso-Holgado, Alberto M Heredia-Rizo
JournalEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine (Eur J Phys Rehabil Med) Vol. 57 Issue 5 Pg. 767-774 (Oct 2021) ISSN: 1973-9095 [Electronic] Italy
PMID33759439 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Chronic Pain (therapy)
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Humans
  • Neck Pain (therapy)
  • Physical Therapy Modalities

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: