HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

[Comparison of the safety and outcomes between keyhole surgery and total laminectomy for resection of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors].

Abstract
Objective: To compare the safety and outcomes between keyhole surgery and total laminectomy for resection of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors. Methods: Retrospectively collected the clinical data of 102 patients with intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors(≤3 cm) treated by surgery in Department of Orthopedics in Fujian Provincial Hospital from January 2014 to January 2017. Fifty cases underwent the keyhole surgery and the other 52 received total laminectomy. The operation time, volume of intraoperative bleeding, the leaving bed time, the length of postoperative hospital stay, drainage, postoperative complications, intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring (IONM), preoperative and postoperative visual analogue score (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), Oswestry disability index (ODI), McCormick spinal cord function grading were analyzed and compared between the two groups to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes. The data of two groups were compared by t, χ(2) or rank sum test. Results: The keyhole group was followed up for (30±15) months and the total laminectomy group was followed up for (45±15) months. All the tumors were completely resected. All the incision healed well and no cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred. There was no statistically significant differences in baseline data, operation time, the results of IONM, preoperative and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months postoperative VAS, NDI (cervical tumors), ODI (thoracic and lumbar tumors), McCormick spinal cord function grading, tumor recurrence between the two groups (all P>0.05). The keyhole group had less intraoperative bleeding than that in the total laminectomy group ((73±24) ml vs (136±26) ml, t=-12.610, P<0.05), earlier postoperative leaving bed time ((1.4±0.6) d vs (6.5±1.0) d, t=-31.822, P<0.05), and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter ((4.3±0.8) d vs (11.2±2.0) d, t=-22.319, P<0.05), and it was more advantageous in terms of drainage. The VAS, NDI and ODI in the keyhole group improved significantly compared with those in the total laminectomy group 2 weeks post operation (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the total laminectomy, keyhole surgery is suitable for the treatment of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors with small size and limited location, and it is equivalently safe with faster functional recovery.
AuthorsY Li, J Xu, W Zheng
JournalZhonghua yi xue za zhi (Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi) Vol. 100 Issue 39 Pg. 3093-3098 (Oct 27 2020) ISSN: 0376-2491 [Print] China
PMID33105961 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Topics
  • Humans
  • Laminectomy
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spinal Cord Neoplasms (surgery)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: