Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with a tumor size ≤ 2 cm who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal radical hysterectomy in China between 2004 and 2016. A real-world study (RWS) and 1:1 matching was used in the study. RESULTS: After 1:1 matching, laparoscopic (n = 926) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (n = 926) had similar 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates in stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumor size ≤ 2 cm. Subsequently, in cervical squamous carcinoma with tumor size ≤ 2 cm, the laparoscopic and abdominal groups (724 cases, respectively) showed comparable 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates. Finally, in cervical adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma with tumor size ≤ 2 cm, the laparoscopic group (n = 174) had a similar 5-year overall survival rate but a lower disease-free survival rate compared to those of the abdominal group (disease-free survival: 89.9% vs. 98.0%, respectively, P = 0.006; hazard ratio (HR), 5.094; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.400-18.535; P = 0.013; n = 174). The RWS results were similar to the 1:1 matching results. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Chunlin Chen, Ping Liu, Yan Ni, Lian Tang, Yan Xu, Xiaonong Bin, Jinghe Lang |
Journal | International journal of clinical oncology
(Int J Clin Oncol)
Vol. 25
Issue 5
Pg. 937-947
(May 2020)
ISSN: 1437-7772 [Electronic] Japan |
PMID | 32062731
(Publication Type: Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
|
Topics |
- Abdomen
(surgery)
- Adenocarcinoma
(pathology)
- Adult
- Carcinoma, Adenosquamous
(mortality, pathology, surgery)
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
(mortality, pathology, surgery)
- Case-Control Studies
- China
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Humans
- Hysterectomy
(methods)
- Laparoscopy
(methods)
- Middle Aged
- Retrospective Studies
- Survival Rate
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
(mortality, pathology, surgery)
|