Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: RESULTS: Our search yielded 16 randomized studies. Comparisons of two classes of drugs with at least two studies indicated that (1) CCB and ACEI increased the risk of HF [relative risk (RR) = 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-4.40] and stroke [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13; 1.00-1.26]), respectively, compared to diuretics; and (2) CCB showed a reduction in stroke (HR = 0.77; 0.66-0.89) and total mortality (HR = 0.94; 0.87-1.01) compared to the BB atenolol. Comparisons of two classes of antihypertensive medications with only one study showed that the risk of MI was higher with ARB valsartan versus CCB (HR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.38, p = 0.02). In contrast, losartan lowered the risk of a composite cardiovascular outcome compared to atenolol (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.98, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive subjects with excess weight, diuretics are more effective for preventing HF and stroke than CCB and ACEI, respectively. CCB are a good first-line choice for prevention of cardiovascular disease, except HF.
|
Authors | Emilio Antonio Francischetti, Virginia Genelhu de Abreu, Luiz Felipe da Silva Figueiredo, Rômulo Sperduto Dezonne, Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho |
Journal | American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions
(Am J Cardiovasc Drugs)
Vol. 20
Issue 5
Pg. 447-470
(Oct 2020)
ISSN: 1179-187X [Electronic] New Zealand |
PMID | 31898196
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Antihypertensive Agents
(classification, pharmacology)
- Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
- Cardiovascular Diseases
(mortality, prevention & control)
- Humans
- Hypertension
(drug therapy, etiology)
- Obesity
(diagnosis, physiopathology)
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
|