Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major challenge in the management of
type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Glucose-lowering agents that reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events would be considered a major advance, as recently reported with
liraglutide and
semaglutide, 2
glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and with
empagliflozin and
canagliflozin, 2 SGLT-2 (
sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2) inhibitors, but not with DPP-4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitors. The present review is devoted to CV effects of new oral
glucose-lowering agents.
DPP-4 inhibitors (
gliptins) showed some positive cardiac and vascular effects in preliminary studies, and initial data from phase 2 to 3 clinical trials suggested a reduction in major cardiovascular events. However, subsequent CV outcome trials with
alogliptin,
saxagliptin, and
sitagliptin showed noninferiority but failed to demonstrate any superiority compared with placebo in patients with
type 2 diabetes mellitus and high CV risk. An unexpected higher risk of hospitalization for
heart failure was reported with
saxagliptin.
SGLT-2 inhibitors (
gliflozins) promote glucosuria, thus reducing
glucose toxicity and
body weight, and enhance natriuresis, thus lowering blood pressure. Two CV outcome trials in
type 2 diabetes mellitus patients mainly in
secondary prevention showed remarkable positive results.
Empagliflozin in EMPA-REG-OUTCOME (
EMPAgliflozin Cardiovascular OUTCOME Events in
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients) reduced major cardiovascular events, CV mortality, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for
heart failure. In CANVAS (
Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study), the reduction in CV mortality with
canagliflozin failed to reach statistical significance despite a similar reduction in major cardiovascular events. The underlying protective mechanisms of
SGLT-2 inhibitors remain unknown and both hemodynamic and metabolic explanations have been proposed. CVD-REAL studies (Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Outcomes in New Users of
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors; with the limitation of an observational approach) suggested that these favorable results may be considered as a class effect shared by all
SGLT-2 inhibitors (including
dapagliflozin) and be extrapolated to a larger population of patients with
type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary prevention. Ongoing CV outcome trials with other DPP-4 (
linagliptin) and SGLT-2 (
dapagliflozin,
ertugliflozin) inhibitors should provide additional information about CV effects of both pharmacological classes.