Abstract | OBJECTIVE: DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, SciELO, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched from database inception to December 2016. DATA SELECTION: DATA EXTRACTION: Methodological characteristics of the studies, number of participants, comparison groups, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten trials comprising 226 participants had data that were suitable for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that NIBS combined with other therapies significantly improves hemispatial neglect (standardized mean difference [SMD]=-1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.57 to -1.25; I2=71%). A sensitivity analysis showed that rTMS (SMD=-2.16; 95% CI, -3.00 to -1.33; I2=76%) and tDCS (SMD=-1.07; 95% CI, -1.76 to -0.37; I2=0%) had positive effects on hemispatial neglect. Furthermore, both excitatory (SMD=-2.34; 95% CI, -3.56 to -1.12; I2=65%) and inhibitory (SMD=-1.69; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.88; I2=75%) stimulations were effective. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Ana Paula S Salazar, Patrícia G Vaz, Ritchele R Marchese, Cinara Stein, Camila Pinto, Aline S Pagnussat |
Journal | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
(Arch Phys Med Rehabil)
Vol. 99
Issue 2
Pg. 355-366.e1
(02 2018)
ISSN: 1532-821X [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 28802812
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Topics |
- Activities of Daily Living
- Humans
- Perceptual Disorders
(etiology, therapy)
- Recovery of Function
- Stroke
(complications)
- Stroke Rehabilitation
(methods)
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
|