Long-term Treatment Effects of Lumbar Arthrodeses in Degenerative Disk Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN:

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE:

To (1) evaluate long-term patient-centered clinical outcomes after lumbar arthrodesis with or without decompression for lumbar spondylosis (LS); and (2) compare these outcomes with those of alternative treatments, including nonsurgical and surgical which maintain mobility of the lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:

The effective treatment of LS is a complex clinical and economic concern for patients and health care providers.

METHODS:

SELECTION CRITERIA:

(1) randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing treatment effects of lumbar arthrodesis with other interventions; (2) participants: skeletally mature adults with lumbar degenerative disk disease.

SEARCH METHODS:

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and others. All years through February of 2013 were included. Patient-centered clinical outcomes before treatment, at 12, 24, or >24 months of follow-up, and rate of complications and additional surgical treatment were collected. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pooled treatment effects. The GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the level of evidence.

RESULTS:

The review included 38 studies of 5738 participants. All studies showed strong or at least moderate treatment effects of lumbar arthrodesis at 12, 24, and 48-72 months of follow-up. The level of evidence was moderate at 12 and 24 months, and low at 48-72 months. The pooled long-term treatment effect of lumbar arthrodesis exceeded those of: nonsurgical treatment (P<0.0001) with a moderate level of evidence, and decompression without fusion (P=0.005) with a low level of evidence. The treatment effect of lumbar arthrodesis showed a small inferiority versus arthroplasty at 12 and 24 months of follow-up (P<0.001), but not after 24 months postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS:

This review indicates that surgical stabilization of the lumbar spine is an effective treatment for LS; in particular, for patients with severe chronic low back pain that has been resistant to ≥3 months of conservative therapy.

• Authors: Andriy Noshchenko, Lilian Hoffecker, Emily M Lindley, Evalina L Burger, Christopher M J Cain, Vikas V Patel
• Journal: Journal of spinal disorders & techniques (J Spinal Disord Tech) Vol. 28 Issue 9 Pg. E493-521 (Nov 2015) ISSN: 1539-2465 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 24901878 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review)

Topics

• Arthrodesis (methods)
• Humans
• Intervertebral Disc Degeneration (surgery)
• Low Back Pain (etiology)
• Patient Outcome Assessment
• Publication Bias
• Surveys and Questionnaires
• Time Factors
• Treatment Outcome