HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Prostate cancer: to screen or not to screen.

Abstract
Screening for early detection of prostate cancer seems both necessary and possible but it remains to be proven that it can lower mortality from the disease. Until properly evaluated, the risks of screening at present do not justify either the cost or the potential benefit that could result. An increased awareness of the problems encountered by screening could lead to greater impetus around the world to design and implement the proper studies. The recent information about the outcome following conservative management means that the value of treatment must also be assessed since it is possible that the only tumors cured by radiation therapy or surgery are those that are not life threatening, whereas the most lethal tumors are not identified sufficiently early by the available screening tests to be cured. The increased incidence and mortality from prostate cancer should lead to increased pressure to answer the important questions as soon as possible.
AuthorsG Chodak
JournalActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) (Acta Oncol) Vol. 30 Issue 2 Pg. 285-7 ( 1991) ISSN: 0284-186X [Print] England
PMID2029423 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
Topics
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening
  • Prostatic Neoplasms (prevention & control)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: