HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To compare the efficacy and safety of orally administered capecitabine (Xeloda; Roche Laboratories, Inc, Nutley, NJ), a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate designed to mimic continuous fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion but with preferential activation at the tumor site, with that of intravenous (IV) 5-FU plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
We prospectively randomized 602 patients to treatment with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) administered twice daily days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, or to the 4-weekly Mayo Clinic regimen (5-FU/LV) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
RESULTS:
The primary objective, to demonstrate at least equivalent response rates in the two treatment groups, was met. The overall response rate was 18.9% for capecitabine and 15.0% for 5-FU/LV. In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, respectively, median time to disease progression was 5.2 and 4.7 months (log-rank P =.65); median time to treatment failure was 4.2 and 4.0 months (log-rank P =.89); and median overall survival was 13.2 and 12.1 months (log-rank P =.33). The toxicity profiles of both treatments were typical of fluoropyrimidines. However, capecitabine led to significantly lower incidences (P <.00001) of stomatitis and alopecia, but a higher incidence of cutaneous hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001). Capecitabine also resulted in lower incidences (P <.00001) of grade 3/4 stomatitis and neutropenia, leading to a lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenic fever and sepsis. Only grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001) and uncomplicated grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia (P <.0001) were reported more frequently with capecitabine.
CONCLUSION:
Oral capecitabine achieved an at least equivalent efficacy compared with IV 5-FU/LV. Capecitabine demonstrated clinically meaningful safety advantages and the convenience of an oral agent.
AuthorsE Van Cutsem, C Twelves, J Cassidy, D Allman, E Bajetta, M Boyer, R Bugat, M Findlay, S Frings, M Jahn, J McKendrick, B Osterwalder, G Perez-Manga, R Rosso, P Rougier, W H Schmiegel, J F Seitz, P Thompson, J M Vieitez, C Weitzel, P Harper, Xeloda Colorectal Cancer Study Group
JournalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (J Clin Oncol) Vol. 19 Issue 21 Pg. 4097-106 (Nov 01 2001) ISSN: 0732-183X [Print] United States
PMID11689577 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
  • Prodrugs
  • Deoxycytidine
  • Capecitabine
  • Leucovorin
  • Fluorouracil
Topics
  • Adenocarcinoma (drug therapy, secondary)
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Capecitabine
  • Colorectal Neoplasms (drug therapy, pathology)
  • Deoxycytidine (administration & dosage, adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Fluorouracil (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Leucovorin (administration & dosage)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prodrugs (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: