Abstract |
A double-blind, randomized study was carried out in 37 patients with acne vulgaris to compare the efficacy of two similar lotion formulations, one with (' Actinac') and the other without chloramphenicol (4%). Patients used one or other of the two formulations twice daily for the first 4 days and then at night only for the remainder of the 3-month trial period. At the end of the first month's treatment, the group treated with the full formulation showed a statistically significant greater reduction in lesion count score than in the group receiving the formulation without chloramphenicol. Both treatments produced statistically significant reductions in lesion counts at all monthly follow-up visits. After 3-months' treatment, the mean lesion count score was reduced from 28.8 to 9.3 in the full formulation-treated group and from 39.5 to 14.3 in the formulation minus chloramphenicol group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance.
|
Authors | N B Fraser, R A Main, T W Stewart, E J Thornton |
Journal | Current medical research and opinion
(Curr Med Res Opin)
Vol. 6
Issue 7
Pg. 461-5
( 1980)
ISSN: 0300-7995 [Print] England |
PMID | 6444862
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Drug Combinations
- Excipients
- Nicotinic Acids
- Allantoin
- hydrocortisone acetate
- Chloramphenicol
- Sulfur
- Hydrocortisone
|
Topics |
- Acne Vulgaris
(drug therapy)
- Administration, Topical
- Allantoin
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
(therapeutic use)
- Chemical Precipitation
- Chloramphenicol
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Double-Blind Method
- Drug Combinations
- Excipients
(therapeutic use)
- Female
- Humans
- Hydrocortisone
(analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
- Male
- Nicotinic Acids
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Sulfur
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
|