HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability in second or latter line using synthetic control arms: A non-randomised evaluation.

AbstractPURPOSE:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) appeared active in single-arm trials for patients with chemoresistant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring microsatellite instability (MSI). Given the paucity of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in this setting, we evaluated the effect size of ICIs using intra-patients comparison and ARCAD database as historical controls.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Individual-patient data from NIPICOL and CheckMate 142 phase II trials that evaluated a combination of ICIs for MSI mCRC patients (N = 176) and from five non-ICI mCRC historical RCTs in second-line or latter (N = 4026) were analyzed. Firstly, promising of ICIs was identified using intra-patient comparison based on growth modulation index (GMI) defined the ratio of progression-free survivals (PFS) on ICIs and previous line of therapy. Survival outcomes of ICIs-treated patients were then compared with those matched non-ICIs treated from ARCAD database historical RCTs.
RESULTS:
Among ICIs-treated patients, median PFS on ICIs was 32.66 (range 0.10-74.25) versus 4.07 months (range 0.7-49.87) on prior therapy, resulting on median GMI of 4.97 (range 0.07-59.51; hazard-ratio (HR)= 0.16 (95 %CI=0.11-0.22, P < 0.001)). Compared to matched non-ICI patients, in third-line, median overall survival (OS) was not reached with ICIs versus 3.52 months with placebo (HR=0.20, 95 %CI=0.10-0.41, P < 0.001), and 6.51 months with active drugs (HR=0.30, 95 %CI=0.15-0.60, P = 0.001). In second-line, median OS was not reached with ICIs versus 11.7 months with chemotherapy+placebo (HR=0.12, 95 %CI=0.07-0.22, P < 0.001), and 16.3 months with chemotherapy+targeted therapy (HR=0.10, 95 %CI=0.05-0.19, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION:
ICIs demonstrates high effect size for MSI mCRC patients in second-line and later. This work might be useful as an example of methodology to avoid RCTs when benefit from experimental therapy is likely to be high.
AuthorsRomain Cohen, Morteza Raeisi, Benoist Chibaudel, Takayuki Yoshino, Qian Shi, John R Zalcberg, Richard Adams, Chiara Cremolini, Axel Grothey, Robert J Mayer, Eric Van Cutsem, Josep Tabernero, Hideaki Bando, Toshihiro Misumi, Michael J Overman, Thierry André, Aimery de Gramont
JournalEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) (Eur J Cancer) Vol. 199 Pg. 113537 (Mar 2024) ISSN: 1879-0852 [Electronic] England
PMID38241818 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Topics
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (adverse effects)
  • Microsatellite Instability
  • Colonic Neoplasms
  • Databases, Factual
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Rectal Neoplasms
  • Colorectal Neoplasms (drug therapy, genetics)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: