Clinical evidence of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese population.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread worldwide. Integrated Chinese and Western medicine have had some successes in treating COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas (3-drugs-3-formulas) in patients with COVID-19.

SEARCH STRATEGY:

Relevant studies were identified from 12 electronic databases searched from their establishment to April 7, 2022.

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and cohort studies that evaluated the effects of 3-drugs-3-formulas for COVID-19. The treatment group was treated with one of the 3-drugs-3-formulas plus conventional treatment. The control group was treated with conventional treatment.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS:

Two evaluators screened and selected literature independently, then extracted basic information and assessed risk of bias. The treatment outcome measures were duration of main symptoms, hospitalization time, aggravation rate and mortality. RevMan 5.4 was used to analyze the pooled results reported as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data.

RESULTS:

Forty-one studies with a total of 13,260 participants were identified. Our analysis suggests that compared with conventional treatment, the combination of 3-drugs-3-formulas might shorten duration of fever (MD = -1.39; 95% CI: -2.19 to -0.59; P < 0.05), cough (MD = -1.57; 95% CI: -2.16 to -0.98; P < 0.05) and fatigue (MD = -1.36; 95% CI: -2.21 to -0.51; P < 0.05), decrease length of hospital stay (MD = -2.62; 95% CI -3.52 to -1.72; P < 0.05), the time for nucleic acid conversion (MD = -2.92; 95% CI: -4.26 to -1.59; P < 0.05), aggravation rate (RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.64; P < 0.05) and mortality (RR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.62; P < 0.05), and increase the recovery rate of chest computerized tomography manifestations (RR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.3; P < 0.05) and total effectiveness (RR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.42; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The 3-drugs-3-formulas can play an active role in treating all stages of COVID-19. No severe adverse events related to 3-drugs-3-formulas were observed. Hence, 3-drugs-3-formulas combined with conventional therapies have effective therapeutic value for COVID-19 patients. Further long-term high-quality studies are essential to demonstrate the clinical benefits of each formula. Please cite this article as: You LZ, Dai QQ, Zhong XY, Yu DD, Cui HR, Kong YF, Zhao MZ, Zhang XY, Xu QQ, Guan ZY, Wei XX, Zhang XC, Han SJ, Liu WJ, Chen Z, Zhang XY, Zhao C, Jin YH, Shang HC. Clinical evidence of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese population. J Integr Med. 2023; 21(5): 441-454.

• Authors: Liang-Zhen You, Qian-Qian Dai, Xiao-Ying Zhong, Dong-Dong Yu, He-Rong Cui, Yi-Fan Kong, Meng-Zhu Zhao, Xin-Yi Zhang, Qian-Qian Xu, Zhi-Yue Guan, Xu-Xu Wei, Xue-Cheng Zhang, Song-Jie Han, Wen-Jing Liu, Zhao Chen, Xiao-Yu Zhang, Chen Zhao, Ying-Hui Jin, Hong-Cai Shang
• Journal: Journal of integrative medicine (J Integr Med) Vol. 21 Issue 5 Pg. 441-454 (09 2023) ISSN: 2095-4964 [Print] Netherlands
• PMID: 37596131 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, Systematic Review)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2023 Shanghai Changhai Hospital. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Chemical References

• Drugs, Chinese Herbal

Topics

• Humans
• Asian People
• Cough (etiology)
• COVID-19 (complications, therapy)
• Fever (etiology)
• Medicine, Chinese Traditional (methods)
• Drugs, Chinese Herbal (therapeutic use)
• COVID-19 Drug Treatment (methods)
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic