Abstract | Background: Methods: We retrospectively reviewed crizotinib-treated ROS1- and ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients between January 2011 and March 2021. Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and progression patterns during treatment were collected from medical records. The metastasis extent, crizotinib response, and progression patterns between the groups were compared. Results: We identified 26 patients with ROS1- and 42 with ALK-positive NSCLC. The baseline proportion of central nervous system (CNS) metastases did not differ between the groups (12% vs. 29%, P=0.10), but the proportion of extrathoracic metastases, including CNS metastases, was significantly higher in ALK-positive than in ROS1-positive NSCLC patients (35% vs. 71%, P=0.003). Regarding the response to crizotinib, the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between the groups (ROS1 vs. ALK, ORR: 69% vs. 69%, P=0.987; PFS: median 10.9 vs. 10.7 months, P=0.232; median OS: not reached vs. 67.7 months, P=0.495). The CNS was the most common metastasis site in both groups [ROS1 vs. ALK, 69% (11/16) vs. 46% (17/37), P=0.127], and the cumulative incidence of CNS metastasis did not differ between the groups (P=0.914). Conclusions:
Crizotinib treatment outcomes, including progression patterns, were similar between ROS1- and ALK-positive NSCLC patients.
|
Authors | Tomoaki Nakamura, Tatsuya Yoshida, Yuki Takeyasu, Ken Masuda, Yuki Sinno, Yuji Matsumoto, Yusuke Okuma, Yasushi Goto, Hidehito Horinouchi, Noboru Yamamoto, Yuichiro Ohe |
Journal | Translational lung cancer research
(Transl Lung Cancer Res)
Vol. 12
Issue 7
Pg. 1436-1444
(Jul 31 2023)
ISSN: 2218-6751 [Print] China |
PMID | 37577313
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Copyright | 2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. |