BACKGROUNDWarts,
hypogammaglobulinemia,
infections, and myelokathexis (
WHIM) syndrome is a
primary immunodeficiency disorder caused by heterozygous gain-of-function CXCR4 mutations. Myelokathexis is a kind of
neutropenia caused by neutrophil retention in bone marrow and in
WHIM syndrome is associated with
lymphopenia and monocytopenia. The CXCR4 antagonist
plerixafor mobilizes leukocytes to the blood; however, its safety and efficacy in
WHIM syndrome are undefined.METHODSIn this investigator-initiated, single-center, quadruple-masked phase III crossover trial, we compared the total
infection severity score (TISS) as the primary endpoint in an intent-to-treat manner in 19 patients with WHIM who each received 12 months treatment with
plerixafor and 12 months treatment with granulocyte CSF (
G-CSF, the standard of care for
severe congenital neutropenia). The treatment order was randomized for each patient.RESULTSPlerixafor was nonsuperior to
G-CSF for TISS (P = 0.54). In exploratory endpoints,
plerixafor was noninferior to
G-CSF for maintaining neutrophil counts of more than 500 cells/μL (P = 0.023) and was superior to
G-CSF for maintaining lymphocyte counts above 1,000 cells/μL (P < 0.0001). Complete regression of a subset of large
wart areas occurred on
plerixafor in 5 of 7 patients with major
wart burdens at baseline. Transient
rash occurred on
plerixafor, and bone
pain was more common on
G-CSF. There were no significant differences in drug preference or quality of life or the incidence of drug failure or serious adverse events.CONCLUSIONPlerixafor was not superior to
G-CSF in patients with WHIM for TISS, the primary endpoint. Together with
wart regression and hematologic improvement, the
infection severity results support continued study of
plerixafor as a potential treatment for
WHIM syndrome.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicaltrials.gov NCT02231879.FUNDINGThis study was funded by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.