Abstract |
The field of transplantation would benefit from the integration of advanced precision medicine techniques. Although predictive tests for lung transplantation require a well-defined clinical end-point, there exists no consensus regarding which outcomes are optimal end-points for these purposes. While many possible candidate end-points exist, we propose that time-to-extubation is an optimal end-point for prognostic tests because of its: clinical relevance; objectiveness; stability over time; and association with healthcare expenditure. Herein, we describe the rationale for this selection and present the limitations of alternative outcomes for this purpose. Using a 72-hour cut-off, time to extubation correlated well with Primary Graft Dysfunction Grade 3, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and a greater than 2-fold increase in healthcare cost ratios. Given that time-to-extubation is an objective measure that is readily measured by all lung transplant centers, this metric represents a preferred primary end-point for prognostic tests developed for lung transplantation.
|
Authors | Andrew T Sage, John Peel, Jerome Valero, Jonathan C Yeung, Mingyao Liu, Marcelo Cypel, Beate Sander, Shaf Keshavjee |
Journal | The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation
(J Heart Lung Transplant)
Vol. 42
Issue 11
Pg. 1515-1517
(11 2023)
ISSN: 1557-3117 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 37406839
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2023 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Topics |
- Humans
- Prognosis
- Airway Extubation
- Transplant Recipients
- Lung
- Lung Transplantation
(methods)
- Retrospective Studies
- Length of Stay
|