Effect of inhaled anaesthetics on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Sedation of critically ill patients with inhaled anaesthetics may reduce lung inflammation, time to extubation, and ICU length of stay compared with intravenous (i.v.) sedatives. However, the impact of inhaled anaesthetics on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in this population is unclear. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarise the effect of inhaled anaesthetics on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in critically ill adults.

METHODS:

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for case series, retrospective, and prospective studies in critically ill adults sedated with inhaled anaesthetics. Outcomes included delirium, psychomotor and neurological recovery, long-term cognitive dysfunction, ICU memories, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and instruments used for assessment.

RESULTS:

Thirteen studies were included in distinct populations of post-cardiac arrest survivors (n=4), postoperative noncardiac patients (n=3), postoperative cardiac patients (n=2), and mixed medical-surgical patients (n=4). Eight studies reported delirium incidence, two neurological recovery, and two ICU memories. One study reported on psychomotor recovery, long-term cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. A meta-analysis of five trials found no difference in delirium incidence between inhaled and i.v. sedatives (relative risk 0.95 [95% confidence interval: 0.59-1.54]). Compared with i.v. sedatives, inhaled anaesthetics were associated with fewer hallucinations and faster psychomotor recovery but no differences in other outcomes. There was heterogeneity in the instruments used and timing of these assessments.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on the limited evidence available, there is no difference in cognitive and psychiatric outcomes between adults exposed to volatile sedation or intravenous sedation in the ICU. Future studies should incorporate outcome assessment with validated tools during and after hospital stay.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL:

PROSPERO CRD42021236455.

• Authors: Sean Cuninghame, Angela Jerath, Kevin Gorsky, Asaanth Sivajohan, Conall Francoeur, Davinia Withington, Lisa Burry, Brian H Cuthbertson, Beverley A Orser, Claudio Martin, Adrian M Owen, Marat Slessarev, Sedating with Volatile Anesthetics Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients in ICU: Effects on Ventilatory Parameters and Survival study investigators
• Journal: British journal of anaesthesia (Br J Anaesth) Vol. 131 Issue 2 Pg. 314-327 (08 2023) ISSN: 1471-6771 [Electronic] England
• PMID: 37344338 (Publication Type: Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article, Review)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2023 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Chemical References

• Hypnotics and Sedatives
• Anesthetics

Topics

• Humans
• Adult
• Critical Illness
• Prospective Studies
• Retrospective Studies
• Hypnotics and Sedatives
• Anesthetics
• Delirium
• Cognition
• Intensive Care Units