HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing the Rate of Post-operative Periprosthetic Fracture Following Hip Arthroplasty With a Polished Taper Slip versus Composite Beam Stem.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
We compared the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) following hip arthroplasty with either a cemented polished taper slip (PTS) stem or a cemented composite beam (CB) stem in comparative studies.
METHODS:
A systematic review of comparative studies, written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals since the year 2000, was conducted. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.The overall study qualities were good. There were 913,021 patients from 18 cohorts included in the meta-analysis. There were 294,540 patients who received a CB stem and 618,481 received a PTS stem. Cohorts were classified as high- or low-risk for POPFF based on patient risk factors. A metanalysis was performed using a random effects model, and the relative incidence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was reported.
RESULTS:
The patients at low risk of POPFF had an incidence rate ratio of 3.14 (CI: 2.48, 3.98) for the PTS group versus the CB group. Whereas, the patients at high risk of POPFF had an incidence rate ratio of 9.87 (CI: 3.63, 26.80) for the PTS group versus the CB group.
CONCLUSIONS:
The risk of POPFF is lower when hip arthroplasty was performed using a CB stem versus a PTS stem. This protective effect was greatest in patients who had a higher risk of POPFF. Surgeons should consider the effect of cemented stem choice on the risk of subsequent periprosthetic femur fracture, particularly in frail or elderly patients who are at a higher risk of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture.
AuthorsAhmed Mabrouk, Jacob R Feathers, Ansar Mahmood, Robert West, Hemant Pandit, Jonathan N Lamb
JournalThe Journal of arthroplasty (J Arthroplasty) Vol. 39 Issue 1 Pg. 269-275 (Jan 2024) ISSN: 1532-8406 [Electronic] United States
PMID37343648 (Publication Type: Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Humans
  • Aged
  • Periprosthetic Fractures (epidemiology, etiology, surgery)
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip (adverse effects)
  • Hip Prosthesis (adverse effects)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Reoperation (adverse effects)
  • Femoral Fractures (epidemiology, etiology, surgery)
  • Prosthesis Design

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: