HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Retrospective review of Andexanet Alfa versus 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for reversal of DOAC-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Abstract
 Background: Mortality of oral anticoagulation-associated ICH is around 60%, with oral anticoagulation increasing the risk of ICH seven to ten-fold compared to no anticoagulation. Current guidelines recommend DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants) as first-line therapy in the treatment of VTE (Venous Thromboembolism) due to their more favorable safety profile. There are two agents available for DOAC reversal, Coagulation Factor Xa (recombinant), inactivated-zhzo (andexanet alfa, Andexxa®) and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC). There is little data comparing the two agents in real-life clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE:
The primary objective of this study was to determine if there was a difference in hemostatic efficacy of andexanet alfa and 4FPCC in patients with a factor Xa inhibitor-related intracranial hemorrhage.
METHODS:
This was a retrospective, single-center study conducted in adult patients admitted at a quaternary academic medical center from September 2017 to March 2021. Adults with a diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were included if they received either 4FPCC or andexanet alfa for reversal of apixaban or rivaroxaban. In addition to hemostatic efficacy per imaging, we assessed disposition location, cerebral performance score, blood product consumption, and the development of a new thrombus.
RESULTS:
A total of 46 patients were included in this study, 15 received 4FPCC (32%) and 31 received andexanet alfa (68%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients with excellent (4FPCC 9 [60%] vs. andexanet alfa 16 [51.6%], p = 0.61), good (4FPCC 2 [13.3%] vs. andexanet alfa 7 [22.6%]), or poor (4FPCC 1 [6.7%] vs. andexanet alfa 5 [16.1%]) hemostasis after administration of each agent. There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE:
Our study found no difference in hemostatic efficacy between andexanet alfa and 4FPCC. At this time, clinicians should choose an agent based on individual patient presentation and resource availability. Further research will help clarify the role of each agent in the management of DOAC-related intracranial hemorrhage.
AuthorsCamille Troyer, Wesley Nguyen, Annie Xie, Dexter Wimer
JournalJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis (J Thromb Thrombolysis) Vol. 55 Issue 1 Pg. 149-155 (Jan 2023) ISSN: 1573-742X [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID36355324 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© 2022. The Author(s).
Chemical References
  • prothrombin complex concentrates
  • PRT064445
  • Factor Xa
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors
  • Hemostatics
  • Factor IX
  • Anticoagulants
Topics
  • Adult
  • Humans
  • Factor Xa (therapeutic use)
  • Hemorrhage (drug therapy)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Intracranial Hemorrhages (chemically induced, drug therapy)
  • Recombinant Proteins (adverse effects)
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors (adverse effects)
  • Hemostatics (therapeutic use)
  • Factor IX (therapeutic use)
  • Anticoagulants (therapeutic use)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: