Aspirin platelet reactivity on platelet function and clinical outcome in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Whether aspirin platelet reactivity affects platelet function and clinical outcomes with different antiplatelet therapies in patients with mild stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remains unclear. We conducted a subgroup analysis of the PRINCE trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Patients with mild stroke or TIA were randomized into aspirin+ticagrelor, or aspirin+clopidogrel groups; aspirin reaction units (ARU) were measured at the baseline and after 7 ± 2 days to assess response to treatment. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as ≥550 ARU (poor response to aspirin). The platelet functions of ticagrelor and clopidogrel were measured using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay for P2Y12 reaction units (PRU); HPR to P2Y12 was defined as >208 PRU (poor response to P2Y12). Clinical outcomes included stroke and clinical vascular and bleeding events after 90 days.

RESULTS:

Among 628 enrolled patients, 69 (11%) were poor aspirin responders. After 7 ± 2 days, the proportion of poor P2Y12 responders for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced in poor (2.6% versus 27.4%) and good (14.3% versus 29.4%) aspirin responders. There were significant interactions between treatment groups, and between treatment groups and aspirin platelet reactivity for poor P2Y12 responders (P = 0.01). After 90 ± 7 days, there were no significant interactions between treatment groups and aspirin platelet reactivity for new stroke risk (good aspirin responders: 5.5% versus 8.8%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 1.16; P = 0.13; poor aspirin responders: 8.6% versus 8.8%, HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.20-4.81; P = 0.97; P for interaction = 0.60). Major bleeding was less frequent in poor than good aspirin responders (ticagrelor/aspirin: 0.4%/0%; clopidogrel/aspirin: 1.4%/0%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with minor stroke or TIA, clopidogrel, and particularly ticagrelor, decreased platelet function in poor versus good aspirin responders. The poor platelet reactivity of aspirin could not sufficiently reduce the risk of recurrent stroke with ticagrelor or clopidogrel; however, HPR (poor aspirin response) may have a protective effect on clinically relevant major bleeding.

• Authors: Yanjie Xu, Weiqi Chen, Lingling Jiang, Yicong Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Liping Liu, Dongxiao Yao, Lei Guo, Yongjun Wang, Yuesong Pan, Yilong Wang
• Journal: Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis) Vol. 31 Issue 9 Pg. 106683 (Sep 2022) ISSN: 1532-8511 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 35914511 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Chemical References

• Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
• Clopidogrel
• Ticagrelor
• Aspirin

Topics

• Aspirin (adverse effects)
• Clopidogrel (adverse effects)
• Drug Therapy, Combination
• Humans
• Ischemic Attack, Transient (chemically induced, diagnosis, drug therapy)
• Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors (adverse effects)
• Stroke (chemically induced, diagnosis, drug therapy)
• Ticagrelor (adverse effects)
• Treatment Outcome