Glenoid wear and its impact on clinical results after humeral head replacement using a single prosthesis in cuff tear arthropathy with more than 8 years of follow-up.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Glenoid wear (GW) is a long-term complication after humeral head replacement (HHR) and is one of the major reasons for revision surgery. This study aimed to evaluate GW at >8 years of follow-up after HHR in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) by use of a modified classification of GW, to examine the relationship between GW and clinical outcomes, and to identify risk factors for GW progression.

METHODS:

This retrospective case-series study included 34 shoulders that were monitored for >8 years after HHR in patients with CTA (13 men and 21 women; mean age at surgery, 70.9 years [range, 55-82 years]). Patients were monitored for a mean of 10.3 years (range, 8.1-13.2 years). GW was classified using plain radiographs as follows: grade 0, no remarkable postoperative changes; grade 1, postoperative glenohumeral joint space narrower than preoperative glenohumeral joint space; grade 2, contact between glenoid and humeral head prosthesis; and grade 3, glenoid erosion. Grade 3 cases were further classified into the following subtypes: grade 3A, partial erosion of anterior glenoid; grade 3B, partial erosion of superior glenoid; and grade 3C, concentric erosion of glenoid. Clinical outcomes including range of motion (active flexion and active external rotation) and postoperative pain (Constant score) were compared between grade 0-2 shoulders and grade 3 shoulders, as well as between the grade 3 subtypes. Age, sex, preoperative range of motion, preoperative pain, and number of ruptured tendons were analyzed as possible risk factors for progression to grade 3.

RESULTS:

The final GW grade was grade 0 in 3 shoulders, grade 1 in 10, grade 2 in 6, and grade 3 in 15 (grade 3A in 2, grade 3B in 6, and grade 3C in 7). The grade 3 group had lower pain scores (10.7 ± 6.2 vs. 14.2 ± 1.9, P = .044) and limited active flexion (108.2° ± 42.3° vs. 140.6° ± 26.7°, P = .041) compared with the grade 0-2 group. Subtype comparison showed that the grade 3B group had lower pain scores (7.0 ± 6.7 vs. 15.0 ± 0.0, P = .007) and limited active flexion (80.0° ± 26.2° vs. 140.8° ± 27.5°, P = .010) compared with the grade 3C group. Limited preoperative active external rotation was an individual risk factor for grade 3 GW (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.99; P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS:

In the long term (>8 years) after HHR with tendon transfer in patients with CTA, patients with the development of grade 3C GW ultimately achieve pain relief even without revision surgery whereas grade 3B GW is associated with persistent pain and might require revision surgery.

• Authors: Jun Kawamata, Naoki Suenaga, Naomi Oizumi, Chika Yoshioka, Naoki Miyoshi, Isoya Goya
• Journal: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery (J Shoulder Elbow Surg) Vol. 31 Issue 12 Pg. 2586-2594 (Dec 2022) ISSN: 1532-6500 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 35716899 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Topics

• Humans
• Male
• Female
• Middle Aged
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Humeral Head (surgery)
• Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy (surgery)
• Arthroplasty, Replacement (adverse effects, methods)
• Retrospective Studies
• Follow-Up Studies
• Shoulder Joint (diagnostic imaging, surgery)
• Joint Prosthesis
• Range of Motion, Articular
• Pain (etiology)
• Treatment Outcome