HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Validation and comparison of multiple risk scores for prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis in VISTA.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND AIMS:
Prediction models/scores may help to identify patients at high risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) after intravenous thrombolysis. We aimed to validate and compare the performance of different prediction models for sICH after thrombolysis using direct model estimation in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA).
METHODS:
We searched PubMed for potentially eligible prediction models from inception to 1 June 2019. Simple and practical models/scores were validated in VISTA. The primary outcome was sICH based on two criteria (National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, NINDS; Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study, SITS-MOST) and the secondary outcome was parenchymal hematoma (PH). The discrimination performance of each model was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and calibration was evaluated by Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests.
RESULTS:
We found 13 prediction models and five models (HAT, MSS, SPAN-100, GRASPS and THRIVE) were finally validated in VISTA. A total of 1884 participants were eligible for our study, of whom the proportion with sICH was 4.6% (87/1884) per NINDS and 3.9% (73/1884) per SITS-MOST, and with PH was 11.3% (213/1884). MSS and GRASPS had the greatest predictive ability for sICH (NINDS criteria: MSS AUC 0.7, 95% CI 0.63-0.77, p < 0.001; GRASPS AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.76, p < 0.001; SITS-MOST criteria: MSS, AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.85, p < 0.001; GRASPS, AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.87, p < 0.001). Similar results were found for PH (MSS AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.73, p = 0.017; GRASPS AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.63-0.72, p = 0.017). The calibration of each model was almost good.
CONCLUSION:
MSS and GRASPS had good discrimination and calibration for sICH and PH after thrombolysis as assessed in VISTA. These two models could be used in clinical practice and clinical trials to identity individuals with high risk of sICH.
AuthorsYanan Wang, Junfeng Liu, Qian Wu, Yajun Cheng, Ming Liu, VISTA Collaborators
JournalInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society (Int J Stroke) Vol. 18 Issue 3 Pg. 338-345 (03 2023) ISSN: 1747-4949 [Electronic] United States
PMID35637570 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
Topics
  • Humans
  • Stroke (complications)
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator (adverse effects)
  • Fibrinolytic Agents (adverse effects)
  • Thrombolytic Therapy (adverse effects, methods)
  • Cerebral Hemorrhage (complications)
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Brain Ischemia (drug therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: