HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of nalbuphine, pethidine and placebo as premedication for minor gynaecological surgery.

Abstract
In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial involving 80 patients nalbuphine 10 mg and 20 mg were compared with pethidine 100 mg and a placebo given i.m. at least 90 min before minor gynaecological surgery. Nalbuphine proved a suitable alternative to pethidine, producing beneficial sedation which was maximum at 60 min after injection. Both nalbuphine and pethidine reduced the excitatory sequelae of methohexitone induction. Increasing the dose of nalbuphine from 10 mg to 20 mg produced no significant additional sedation or intraoperative benefit. Short-lived pain at the injection site was a feature of the use of nalbuphine in either dose. The main disadvantage of nalbuphine was nausea and vomiting of delayed onset, the frequency of which was similar after either dose.
AuthorsW N Chestnutt, R S Clarke, J W Dundee
JournalBritish journal of anaesthesia (Br J Anaesth) Vol. 59 Issue 5 Pg. 576-80 (May 1987) ISSN: 0007-0912 [Print] England
PMID3555569 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Morphinans
  • Meperidine
  • Nalbuphine
Topics
  • Adult
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Meperidine (adverse effects)
  • Morphinans
  • Nalbuphine (adverse effects)
  • Nausea (chemically induced)
  • Postoperative Complications (etiology)
  • Preanesthetic Medication
  • Vomiting (chemically induced)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: