HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Immunotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Pembrolizumab and atezolizumab have recently been approved for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who are not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression; however, the use of these immunotherapeutic agents relative to standard of care chemotherapy has ongoing concerns. The aim of this present study is to compare the effectiveness of single-agent immune-oncology (IO) compounds versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line setting of aUC.
METHODS:
A comprehensive search for phase III trials on IO versus chemotherapy was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 01/2016 to 05/2021. An algorithm to obtain survival data from published Kaplan-Meier curves was used to reconstruct overall survival (OS) data. After demonstrating violation of the proportional hazard assumption, we used the difference in restricted mean survival time (ΔRMST) to compare OS.
RESULTS:
OS data from 2,068 individuals from 3 phase III trials investigating the role of IO vs chemotherapy were reconciled. Overall, patients receiving IO [n = 1,013 (49%)] or chemotherapy [n = 1,055 (51%)] had similar OS with a 24-month ΔRMST of -0.4 (95% CI: -1.1, 0.4; p = 0.2) months. In the cisplatin-ineligible population, patients receiving IO [n = 509 (49%)] or chemotherapy [n = 530 (51%)] had similar OS with a 24-month ΔRMST of 0.1 (95% CI: -0.9, 1.2; p = 0.7) months. In the cisplatin-ineligible population with PD-L1-high tumors, patients receiving IO [n = 226 (50%)] or chemotherapy [n = 226 (50%)] had similar OS with a 24-month ΔRMST of 1.1 (95% CI: -0.5, 2.7; p = 0.1) months.
CONCLUSION:
We found no OS benefit for patients treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibition compared to chemotherapy among the overall population, cisplatin-ineligible patients, and PD-L1-high patients.
AuthorsAlberto Martini, Daniele Raggi, Giuseppe Fallara, Luigi Nocera, Julianne G Schultz, Federico Belladelli, Laura Marandino, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Thomas Powles, Andrea Necchi
JournalCancer treatment reviews (Cancer Treat Rev) Vol. 104 Pg. 102360 (Mar 2022) ISSN: 1532-1967 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID35176685 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review)
CopyrightCopyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Cisplatin
Topics
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (therapeutic use)
  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell (drug therapy)
  • Cisplatin (therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms (drug therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: