HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARAGON-HF Trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction comprise a heterogeneous group including some with mildly reduced EF. We hypothesized that mode of death differs by EF in ambulatory patients with HF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
METHODS:
PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) compared clinical outcomes in 4796 patients with chronic HF and EF ≥45% randomly assigned to sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. We examined the mode of death in relation to baseline EF in logistic regression models and the effect of randomized treatment on cause-specific death in Cox regression models. Nonlinear relationships with continuous EF were modelled using quadratic and cubic terms.
RESULTS:
Of 691 deaths during the trial, 416 (60%) were ascribed to cardiovascular, 220 (32%) to noncardiovascular, and 55 (8%) to unknown causes. Of cardiovascular deaths, 154 (37%) were due to sudden death, 118 (28%) were due to HF, 35 (8%) to stroke, 27 (6%) to myocardial infarction, and 82 (20%) to other cardiovascular causes. Rates of all-cause, cardiovascular, and sudden death were higher in those with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (all P<0.001), while rates of non-cardiovascular death were greater in patients with higher EF. Sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce overall death, cardiovascular death, or sudden death compared with valsartan, irrespective of baseline EF (all P for interaction >0.30).
CONCLUSIONS:
Among patients with HF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in PARAGON-HF, the proportion of cardiovascular and sudden death were higher in those with lower left ventricular EF, and the proportion of noncardiovascular death rose with EF. Regardless of EF, sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce death from any cause compared with valsartan. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.
AuthorsAkshay S Desai, Muthiah Vaduganathan, John G Cleland, Brian L Claggett, Ebrahim Barkoudah, Peter Finn, Finnian R McCausland, Mehmet B Yilmaz, Martin Lefkowitz, Victor Shi, Marc A Pfeffer, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon
JournalCirculation. Heart failure (Circ Heart Fail) Vol. 14 Issue 12 Pg. e008597 (12 2021) ISSN: 1941-3297 [Electronic] United States
PMID34807713 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Aminobutyrates
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Tetrazoles
  • sacubitril
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aminobutyrates (therapeutic use)
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists (therapeutic use)
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (therapeutic use)
  • Biphenyl Compounds (therapeutic use)
  • Cause of Death
  • Female
  • Heart Failure (drug therapy, mortality, physiopathology)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Stroke Volume (drug effects)
  • Tetrazoles (therapeutic use)
  • Ventricular Function, Left (drug effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: