Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Over the past decades, remarkable advancements in systemic drug therapy have improved the prognosis of patients with bone metastases. Individualization is required in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for bone metastases according to the patient's prognosis. To establish individualized EBRT for bone metastases, we investigated factors that affect the local control (LC) of bone metastases.

METHODS:

Between January 2010 and December 2019, 536 patients received EBRT for 751 predominantly osteolytic bone metastases. LC at EBRT sites was evaluated with a follow-up computed tomography. The median EBRT dose was biologically effective dose (BED10) (39.0) (range of BED10: 14.4-71.7 Gy).

RESULTS:

The median follow-up time and median time of computed tomography follow-up were 11 (range 1-123) months and 6 (range 1-119) months, respectively. The 0.5- and 1-year overall survival rates were 73% and 54%, respectively. The 0.5- and 1-year LC rates were 83% and 79%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher age (≥ 70 years), non-vertebral bone metastases, unfavorable primary tumor sites (esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary/pancreatic cancer, renal/ureter cancer, sarcoma, melanoma, and mesothelioma), lower EBRT dose (BED10 < 39.0 Gy), and non-administration of bone-modifying agents (BMAs)/antineoplastic agents after EBRT were significantly unfavorable factors for LC of bone metastases. There was no statistically significant difference in the LC between BED10 = 39.0 and BED10 > 39.0 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Regarding tumor-related factors, primary tumor sites and the sites of bone metastases were significant for the LC. As for treatment-related factors, lower EBRT doses (BED10 < 39.0 Gy) and non-administration of BMAs/antineoplastic agents after EBRT were associated with poor LC. Dose escalation from BED10 = 39.0 Gy did not necessarily improve LC.

• Authors: Kenji Makita, Yasushi Hamamoto, Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Masaaki Kataoka, Shuhei Yamamoto, Kei Nagasaki, Hirofumi Ishikawa, Noriko Takata, Shintaro Tsuruoka, Kotaro Uwatsu, Teruhito Kido
• Journal: Radiation oncology (London, England) (Radiat Oncol) Vol. 16 Issue 1 Pg. 225 (Nov 20 2021) ISSN: 1748-717X [Electronic] England
• PMID: 34801042 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
• Copyright: © 2021. The Author(s).

Topics

• Adolescent
• Adult
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Bone Neoplasms (radiotherapy, secondary)
• Child
• Female
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Neoplasms (pathology, radiotherapy)
• Prognosis
• Radiotherapy Dosage
• Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted (methods)
• Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated (methods)
• Retrospective Studies
• Survival Rate
• Young Adult