HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with brain metastases: CheckMate 920.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) has demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety in patients with previously untreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Although most phase 3 clinical trials exclude patients with brain metastases, the ongoing, multicohort phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial (ClincalTrials.gov identifier NCT02982954) evaluated the safety and efficacy of NIVO + IPI in a cohort that included patients with aRCC and brain metastases, as reported here.
METHODS:
Patients with previously untreated aRCC and asymptomatic brain metastases received NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks × 4 followed by NIVO 480 mg every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the incidence of grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) within 100 days of the last dose of study drug. Key secondary end points were progression-free survival and the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (both determined by the investigator). Exploratory end points included overall survival, among others.
RESULTS:
After a minimum follow-up of 24.5 months (N = 28), no grade 5 imAEs occurred. The most common grade 3 and 4 imAEs were diarrhea/colitis (n = 2; 7%) and hypophysitis, rash, hepatitis, and diabetes mellitus (n = 1 each; 4%). The objective response rate was 32% (95% CI, 14.9%-53.5%) with a median duration of response of 24.0 months; 4 of 8 responders remained without reported progression. Seven patients (25%) had intracranial progression. The median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI, 2.9-12.0 months), and the median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 14.1 months to not estimable).
CONCLUSIONS:
In patients who had previously untreated aRCC and brain metastases-a population with a high unmet medical need that often is underrepresented in clinical trials-the approved regimen of NIVO + IPI followed by NIVO showed encouraging antitumor activity and no new safety signals.
AuthorsHamid Emamekhoo, Mark R Olsen, Bradley C Carthon, Alexandra Drakaki, Ivor J Percent, Ana M Molina, Daniel C Cho, Johanna C Bendell, Lucio N Gordan, Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty, Daniel J George, Thomas E Hutson, Edward R Arrowsmith, Joshua Zhang, Jesus Zoco, Jennifer L Johansen, David K Leung, Scott S Tykodi
JournalCancer (Cancer) Vol. 128 Issue 5 Pg. 966-974 (03 01 2022) ISSN: 1097-0142 [Electronic] United States
PMID34784056 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Clinical Trial, Phase IV, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2021 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Chemical References
  • Ipilimumab
  • Nivolumab
Topics
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (adverse effects)
  • Brain Neoplasms (drug therapy, secondary)
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell (drug therapy, pathology)
  • Cohort Studies
  • Humans
  • Ipilimumab (adverse effects)
  • Kidney Neoplasms (drug therapy, pathology)
  • Nivolumab (adverse effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: