Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: Panelists, who were all blinded to the identity of other members of the panel, used a modified Delphi technique to develop a list of statements describing preferred management approaches for uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infections. Panelists provided level of agreement and feedback on consensus statements generated and refined them from the first round of open-ended questions through 3 subsequent rounds. RESULTS: Thirteen infectious diseases specialists (7 physicians and 6 pharmacists) from across the United States participated in the consensus process. A definition of uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infection was developed. Considerations cited by panelists in determining if a bloodstream infection was uncomplicated included host immune status, response to therapy, organism identified, source of the bacteremia, and source control measures. For patients meeting this definition, panelists largely agreed that a duration of therapy of ~7 days, transitioning to oral antibiotic therapy, and forgoing repeat blood cultures, was reasonable. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of professional guidelines for the management of uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infections, the consensus statements developed by a panel of infectious diseases specialists can provide guidance to practitioners for a common clinical scenario.
|
Authors | Emily L Heil, Jacqueline T Bork, Lilian M Abbo, Tamar F Barlam, Sara E Cosgrove, Angelina Davis, David R Ha, Timothy C Jenkins, Keith S Kaye, James S Lewis 2nd, Jessica K Ortwine, Jason M Pogue, Emily S Spivak, Michael P Stevens, Liza Vaezi, Pranita D Tamma |
Journal | Open forum infectious diseases
(Open Forum Infect Dis)
Vol. 8
Issue 10
Pg. ofab434
(Oct 2021)
ISSN: 2328-8957 [Print] United States |
PMID | 34738022
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Copyright | © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. |