HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer.

AbstractPURPOSE:
Proton therapy of esophageal cancer is superior to photon radiation therapy in terms of normal tissue sparing. However, respiratory motion and anatomical changes may compromise target dose coverage owing to density changes, geometric misses, and interplay effects. Here we investigate the combined effect on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and compare proton therapy with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
METHODS AND MATERIALS:
This study includes 26 patients with esophageal cancer previously treated with IMRT planned on 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). For each patient, 7 proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) plans were created with different field configurations and optimization strategies. The effect of respiration was investigated by calculating the phase doses, 4D dose, and 4D dynamic dose (including interplay effects). The effect of anatomical changes was investigated by recalculating all plans on all phases of a 4D-CT surveillance scan.
RESULTS:
The most robust PBS plans were achieved using 2 posterior beams requiring coverage of planning target volume (PTV) and simultaneously using robust optimization (RO) of CTV (2PAPTVRO), resulting in only 1 patient showing V95%CTV <97% in 1 or more phases of the planning CT. For the least robust PBS plans obtained using lateral + posterior beams and CTV-RO, but not requiring PTV coverage (2LPRO), 10 patients showed underdosage. For IMRT, 2 patients showed underdosage. Interplay effects reduced V95%CTV significantly when delivering only 1 fraction, but the effects generally averaged out after 10 fractions. The effect of interplay was significantly larger for RO-only plans compared with plans optimized with RO combined with PTV coverage. Combining the effect of anatomical changes and respiration on the 4D-CT surveillance scan resulted in V95%CTV <97% for 3 2PAPTVRO, 16 2LPRO, and 8 IMRT patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
PBS using posterior beam angles was more robust to anatomical changes and respiration than IMRT. The effect of respiration was enhanced when anatomical changes were present. Single fraction interplay effects deteriorated the dose distribution but were averaged out after 10 fractions.
AuthorsDitte Sloth Møller, Per Rugaard Poulsen, Andreas Hagner, Mathieu Dufour, Marianne Nordsmark, Tine Bisballe Nyeng, Hanna Rahbek Mortensen, Christina Maria Lutz, Lone Hoffmann
JournalInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys) Vol. 111 Issue 2 Pg. 539-548 (10 01 2021) ISSN: 1879-355X [Electronic] United States
PMID33974885 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Esophageal Neoplasms (diagnostic imaging, pathology, radiotherapy)
  • Female
  • Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motion
  • Proton Therapy (methods)
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted (methods)
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
  • Respiration

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: