It remains unclear whether low-dose
ticagrelor offers better safety and similar efficacy for Asian patients with
acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of low-dose
ticagrelor vs standard-dose
ticagrelor in Chinese patients with ACS undergoing
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational cohort study, a total of 2110 ACS patients who were event-free at 3 months after the index PCI were divided into standard-dose
ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) (n = 1830) or low-dose
ticagrelor (45 mg twice daily) (n = 280) on a background of
aspirin 100 mg once daily for at least another 9 months. The primary end point was type 2, 3, or 5
bleeding according to the
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria over a 1-year follow-up period post-PCI. Predictors of the primary end point were identified. Both Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were used. The cumulative incidence of BARC type 2, 3, or 5
bleeding was lower in the low-dose
ticagrelor group vs the standard-dose group either before (adjusted HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.77; p = .016) or after matching (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08-0.85; p = .026). A composite of
cardiac death,
myocardial infarction, or
stroke was not significantly different between the two groups (0.4% vs 0.9%, respectively). By multivariate analysis, only low-dose
ticagrelor was a protected predictor of BARC type 2, 3, or 5
bleeding either before (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.89) or after matching (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.82). A low-dose regimen of
ticagrelor might provide better safety than standard-dose
ticagrelor in Chinese patients with ACS undergoing PCI.