High sensitivity of PD-L1 analysis from pleural effusion in nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Abstract

Background: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for monotherapy of metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) depending on tumour cells' PD-L1 expression. Pleural effusion is common in mNSCLC. The significance of immunocytochemistry PD-L1 analysis from pleural effusion samples is unclear. Aim: The aim of the study was to analyse the sensitivity regarding immunocytochemistry PD-L1 analysis of pleural effusion in NSCLC as compared to immunohistochemistry of pleural biopsies. Patients and Methods: Fifty consecutive subjects (17 female, median age 72.5 years, seven never-smokers) were enrolled in this prospective controlled two-centre study. Inclusion criteria were pleural effusion, suspected or known lung cancer, indication for pleural puncture and thoracoscopy, and written informed consent. Immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry PD-L1 analyses were performed with the Dako-PDL1-IHC-22C3pharmDx assay. Analysis for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value was performed for PD-L1 detection from pleural effusion. Results: 50 subjects underwent pleural puncture and thoracoscopy. Pathological diagnoses were lung cancer (48), lymphoma (1) and mesothelioma (1). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PD-L1-testing with expression ≥50% defined as positive were 100% (95% CI 46-100%), 63% (36-84%), 45% (18-75%) and 100% (66-100%), and with expression ≥1% defined as positive 86% (56-97%), 43% (12-80%), 75% (47-92%) and 60% (17-93%). Conclusion: PD-L1 analysis in tumour-positive pleural effusion samples shows a very high sensitivity and negative predictive value, especially regarding PD-L1 expression levels ≥50% (European Medicines Agency approval). Negative results are reliable and help in the decision against a first-line checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. However, a 1% cut-off level (United States Food and Drug Administration approval) leads to a markedly lower negative predictive value, making other invasive procedures necessary (NCT02855281).

• Authors: Lars Hagmeyer, Stephan Schäfer, Marianne Engels, Anja Pietzke-Calcagnile, Marcel Treml, Simon-Dominik Herkenrath, Matthias Heldwein, Khosro Hekmat, Sandhya Matthes, Andreas Scheel, Jürgen Wolf, Reinhard Büttner, Winfried Randerath
• Journal: ERJ open research (ERJ Open Res) Vol. 7 Issue 1 (Jan 2021) ISSN: 2312-0541 [Print] England
• PMID: 33778051 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
• Copyright: Copyright ©ERS 2021.