HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

The presence of smear layer affects the antimicrobial action of root canal sealers.

AbstractAIM:
To assess the chemical and microstructural characteristics of dentine after the use of two irrigation protocols and correlate this with the antimicrobial properties of hydraulic calcium silicate cement (HCSC) sealers and changes to the dentine structure/chemistry after sealer placement.
METHODOLOGY:
Two irrigation protocols - Protocol A using 2% NaOCl used 5 mL/5 min and Protocol B with 2% NaOCl (5 mL/5 min) followed by 17% EDTA (5 mL/3 min) - were used to prepare dentine. The chemical and microstructural changes following irrigation were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (n = 5) on dentine obtained from the mid-root and coronal parts of extracted human teeth. Four sealers (AH Plus, BioRoot, MTA Fillapex, TotalFill) were characterized by SEM/EDS (n = 3). The ability of the sealers to eradicate intratubular Enterococcus faecalis biofilms was assessed by live/dead dye and confocal laser scanning microscopy to measure the percentage of living cells. The effect of combined irrigation and root filling on dentine was assessed by SEM and EDS analysis (n = 5). Statistical analysis was undertaken using one-way anova and a number of post hoc tests to detect intergroup differences. The F-test was used for comparison of variances in the microbiology testing.
RESULTS:
The use of NaOCl alone left the smear layer intact, with traces of chlorine remaining on dentine. The use of BioRoot sealer restored the calcium levels of dentine which had been depleted by the irrigation with EDTA. BioRoot exhibited antimicrobial properties against intratubular bacteria even in the presence of smear layer (Protocol A). Smear layer removal improved the bactericidal effect of all sealers and Ca2+ leaching. The use of a chelating agent was important for the intratubular sealer penetration for AH Plus but not the other sealers.
CONCLUSION:
The removal of smear layer was necessary for penetration of AH Plus into the dentinal tubules. BioRoot was a more effective sealer in reducing the bacterial load in the dentinal tubules than the other materials tested and the presence of smear layer did not affect its activity.
AuthorsR F Zancan, A Di Maio, P L Tomson, M A H Duarte, J Camilleri
JournalInternational endodontic journal (Int Endod J) Vol. 54 Issue 8 Pg. 1369-1382 (Aug 2021) ISSN: 1365-2591 [Electronic] England
PMID33763882 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© 2021 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Chemical References
  • Anti-Infective Agents
  • Epoxy Resins
  • Root Canal Filling Materials
  • Silicates
Topics
  • Anti-Infective Agents (pharmacology)
  • Dental Pulp Cavity
  • Dentin
  • Epoxy Resins
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Root Canal Filling Materials (pharmacology)
  • Silicates (pharmacology)
  • Smear Layer
  • Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: