STEMI: A transitional fossil in MI classification?

Abstract

An important task in emergency cardiology is distinguishing patients with acute coronary occlusion (ACO), who will benefit from emergent reperfusion therapy, from those without ongoing myocyte loss who can be managed with medical therapy and for whom potentially harmful invasive interventions can be deferred. The electrocardiogram is critical in this process. Although the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)/non-STEMI paradigm is well-established, with "STEMI" representing ACO, its evidence base is poor, and this can have dire consequences. The universally recommended STEMI criteria do not accurately diagnose ACO; in fact, they miss more than one-fourth of the patients with ACO, and also result in a substantial burden of unnecessary catheterization laboratory activations. We here discuss why we believe it is time to change the current STEMI/non-STEMI paradigm.

• Authors: Emre K Aslanger, Pendell H Meyers, Stephen W Smith
• Journal: Journal of electrocardiology (J Electrocardiol) 2021 Mar-Apr Vol. 65 Pg. 163-169 ISSN: 1532-8430 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 33640636 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Topics

• Coronary Occlusion
• Electrocardiography
• Emergency Service, Hospital
• Fossils
• Humans
• ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (diagnosis)