Comparative efficacy of respiratory personal protective equipment against viral respiratory infectious diseases in healthcare workers: a network meta-analysis.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

With the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the healthcare workers (HCWs) require proper respiratory personal protective equipment (rPPE) against viral respiratory infectious diseases (VRIDs). It is necessary to evaluate which type of mask and manner of wearing is the best suitable rPPE for preventing the VRID.

STUDY DESIGN:

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively analyze the protective efficacy of various rPPE.

METHODS:

This network meta-analysis protocol was registered in an international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42020179489). Electronic databases were searched for cluster randomized control trials (RCTs) of comparing the effectiveness of rPPE and wearing manner in preventing HCWs from VRID. The primary outcome was the incidence of laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infection reported as an odds ratio (OR) with the associated 95% credibility interval (CrI). The secondary outcome was the incidence of clinical respiratory illness (CRI) reported as an OR with the associated 95% CrI. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis (SUCRA) provided a ranking of each rPPE according to the primary outcome and the secondary outcome as data supplement.

RESULTS:

Six studies encompassing 12,265 HCWs were included. In terms of the incidence of laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infection, the continuous wearing of N95 respirators (network OR, 0.48; 95% CrI: 0.27 to 0.86; SUCRA score, 85.4) showed more effective than the control group. However, in terms of reducing the incidence of CRI, there was no rPPE showing superior protective effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are significant differences in preventive efficacy among current rPPE. Our result suggests that continuous wearing of N95 respirators on the whole shift can serve as the best preventive rPPE for HCWs from the VRID.

• Authors: X Yin, X Wang, S Xu, C He
• Journal: Public health (Public Health) Vol. 190 Pg. 82-88 (Jan 2021) ISSN: 1476-5616 [Electronic] Netherlands
• PMID: 33360295 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2020 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Topics

• Adult
• Bayes Theorem
• COVID-19 (prevention & control)
• Communicable Disease Control
• Health Personnel (psychology)
• Humans
• Masks
• Network Meta-Analysis
• Personal Protective Equipment
• Respiratory Protective Devices
• Respiratory Tract Infections (prevention & control)
• SARS-CoV-2