HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Caused by Hemabate in Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) caused by hemabate in postpartum hemorrhage during cesarean delivery.
METHODS:
One hundred and five parturients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 20-40 years, undergoing elective cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated into dexmedetomidine group (group D, n=35), midazolam group (group M, n=35) and control group (group C, n=35). Patients received an intrauterine injection of 250 μg hemabate and continuous intravenous infusion of 5 units oxytocin immediately following the delivery of the infant. At the same time, patients in group D received 1μg/kg intravenous dexmedetomidine, group M received 0.02 mg/kg intravenous midazolam and group C received 20 mL intravenous saline. Parameters such as the PONV, other adverse reactions (chest distress, flush, etc.) caused by hemabate, patient satisfaction, the sedation (OAA/S) scores, and the hemodynamic parameters were recorded in both groups.
RESULTS:
The PONV incidence in group D and group M was significantly lower compared with group C (6%, 17%, and 71% for group D, group M, and group C, respectively, P<0.05). The sedation (OAA/S) scores in group D and group M was significantly higher compared with group C (1.62±0.28, 1.75±0.31, and 1.00±0.00 for group D, group M, and group C, respectively, P<0.05). The patient satisfaction in group D and group M was significantly higher compared with group C (94%, 69%, and 46% for group D, group M, and group C, respectively, P<0.05). Furthermore, there were more patients satisfied with group D than group M (94% vs.69%, P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:
Intravenous dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) and midazolam (0.02 mg/kg) were equally effective in preventing PONV introduced by hemabate and dexmedetomidine is superior to midazolam in patient satisfaction.
AuthorsBailong Hu, Haiyan Zhou, Xiaohua Zou, Jing Shi, Xingyu Li, Li Tan
JournalDrug design, development and therapy (Drug Des Devel Ther) Vol. 14 Pg. 2127-2133 ( 2020) ISSN: 1177-8881 [Electronic] New Zealand
PMID32546975 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Copyright© 2020 Hu et al.
Chemical References
  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Midazolam
Topics
  • Adult
  • Cesarean Section (adverse effects)
  • Dexmedetomidine (administration & dosage, pharmacology)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous
  • Midazolam (administration & dosage, pharmacology)
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (prevention & control, surgery)
  • Postpartum Hemorrhage (prevention & control, surgery)
  • Pregnancy
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: