HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of nonfasting and fasting lipoprotein subfractions and size in 15,397 apparently healthy individuals: An analysis from the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Elevated postprandial triglycerides reflect a proatherogenic milieu, but underlying mechanisms are unclear.
OBJECTIVE:
We examined differences between fasting and nonfasting profiles of directly measured lipoprotein size and subfractions to assess if postprandial triglycerides reflected increases in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and remnants, or small dense lipid depleted LDL (sdLDL) particles.
METHODS:
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 15,397 participants (10,135 fasting; 5262 nonfasting [<8 hours since last meal]) from the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL. Baseline cholesterol subfractions were measured by the vertical auto profile method and particle subfractions by ion mobility. We performed multivariable linear regression adjusting for cardiovascular and lipoprotein-modifying risk factors.
RESULTS:
Mean age (SD) was 68.0 years (±7.0), with 50.9% women. Adjusted mean triglyceride concentrations were higher nonfasting by 17.8 ± 1.3%, with higher nonfasting levels of directly measured VLDL cholesterol (by 3.5 ± 0.6%) and total VLDL particles (by 2.0 ± 0.7%), specifically large VLDL (by 12.3 ± 1.3%) and medium VLDL particles (by 5.3 ± 0.8%), all P < .001. By contrast, lower concentrations of low density lipoprotein (LDL) and IDL cholesterol and particles were noted for nonfasting participants. sdLDL cholesterol levels and particle concentrations showed no statistically significant difference by fasting status (-1.3 ± 2.1% and 0.07 ± 0.6%, respectively, P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS:
Directly measured particle and cholesterol concentrations of VLDL, not sdLDL, were higher nonfasting and may partly contribute to the proatherogenicity of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia. These differences, although statistically significant, were small and may not fully explain the increased risk of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia.
AuthorsZareen M Farukhi, Olga V Demler, Michael P Caulfield, Krishnaji Kulkarni, Jay Wohlgemuth, Michael Cobble, Heike Luttmann-Gibson, Chunying Li, John R Nelson, Nancy R Cook, Julie E Buring, Ronald M Krauss, JoAnn E Manson, Samia Mora
JournalJournal of clinical lipidology (J Clin Lipidol) 2020 Mar - Apr Vol. 14 Issue 2 Pg. 241-251 ISSN: 1933-2874 [Print] United States
PMID32205068 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2020 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Lipoproteins
Topics
  • Aged
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Fasting (blood)
  • Female
  • Healthy Volunteers
  • Humans
  • Lipoproteins (blood, chemistry)
  • Male
  • Molecular Weight
  • Postprandial Period

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: