Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: A prospective study was planned with the approval of our institutional review board. 153 lung cancer patients who underwent anatomic resection in a single medical group between June 2019 and Nov 2019 were randomized. 20 patients were applied day surgery and 28 patients by inpatient surgery and the average length of stay, average hospital cost , complications and adverse reactions were analysed. RESULTS: The average hospital day in DSG group (1 d) was significantly shorter than in ISG group (7.7±2.8) d (P=0.000). The average hospital cost in DSG group (38,297.3±3,408.7)¥ was significantly lower than in ISG group (47,831.1±7,376.1)¥ (P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the daytime surgery group (5.0%) and the inpatient surgery group (3.6%) (P=0.812). The postoperation adverse reactions in DSG (10.0%) and ISG (17.9%) is no difference (P=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the same clinical effect achieved between DSG and ISG, and recover quickly lung cancer patients after day surgery.
|
Authors | Yingxian Dong, Daojun Zhu, Guowei Che, Lunxu Liu, Kun Zhou, Tao Zhu, Hongsheng Ma |
Journal | Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer
(Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi)
Vol. 23
Issue 2
Pg. 77-83
(Feb 20 2020)
ISSN: 1999-6187 [Electronic] China |
PMID | 32093451
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
(economics)
- Female
- Humans
- Inpatients
(statistics & numerical data)
- Length of Stay
- Lung Neoplasms
(complications, economics, surgery)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
(economics)
- Outpatients
(statistics & numerical data)
- Postoperative Complications
(economics, epidemiology)
- Prospective Studies
- Treatment Outcome
|