HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Diffractive trifocal lens implantation with or without excimer laser enhancement: is a touch-up procedure a negative predictor for refractive and subjective outcome?

AbstractPURPOSE:
To investigate the refractive results of a LASIK enhancement and its impact on treatment safety, efficacy, predictability and patient reported outcome in eyes after clear lens extraction and diffractive trifocal lens implantation.
METHODS:
A retrospective cohort multicentre study of Care Vision Refractive Centres in Germany compared two groups of patients. Group 1 consisted of eyes that had non-toric MIOL surgery only, whereas group 2 had a consecutive laser enhancement after 3 months follow-up. Refractive and subjective results of the two groups were compared. Patient reported outcome measurements were assessed by using a 30-item questionnaire with four subscales. (Spectacle Dependence, Eye Comfort, Freedom and Looking/Feeling Well). Refractive results were reported following standard reporting in refractive surgery.
RESULTS:
139 eyes of 79 patients were included in which either MIOL surgery or MIOL surgery plus LASIK enhancement had been performed between January and December 2017. UDVA reached 0.1logMAR (0.8; 20/25) in 94% in group 2 and 85% in group 1. Compared to preoperative CDVA no change in Snellen lines of CDVA was shown in 89% in group 1 and in 93% in group 2. Spectacle dependence (P = 0.41), eye comfort (P = 0.15), freedom (P = 0.48) and looking/feeling well (P = 0.45) showed no statistically significant difference between both the groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
In patients with residual ametropia after MIOL implantation, LASIK provides a reliable, safe and efficient way to achieve the desired refractive outcome and patient satisfaction. We recommend performing Laser enhancement at 3 months after MIOL implantation (Bioptics) in trifocal MIOL patients that benefit from improvement of residual ametropia.
AuthorsAnne-Karen von Beckerath, Toam Katz, Anna Harfst, Vasyl Druchkiv, Andreas Frings
JournalGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie (Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol) Vol. 258 Issue 5 Pg. 1115-1121 (May 2020) ISSN: 1435-702X [Electronic] Germany
PMID32076835 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hyperopia (physiopathology, surgery)
  • Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ (methods)
  • Lasers, Excimer (therapeutic use)
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
  • Myopia (physiopathology, surgery)
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Phacoemulsification
  • Pseudophakia (physiopathology)
  • Refraction, Ocular (physiology)
  • Refractive Errors (physiopathology)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Visual Acuity (physiology)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: