Abstract | INTRODUCTION: This systematic review analyzes the literature on the treatment of geriatric hip fractures by a multidisciplinary hip fracture service including geriatricians/internists and orthopaedic surgeons and what impact this has on patient outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of several databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing an orthopaedic-led care model versus a coordinated orthogeriatrics care model or a geriatrics-led care model to treat hip fractures with reported outcomes for time to surgery, length of stay, readmission rates, and postoperative mortality were included. RESULTS: Seventeen articles fitting the inclusion criteria were included. Differences between the results of an orthopaedic-led care model versus a coordinated orthogeriatrics care model or a geriatrics-led care model were assessed using chi-squared tests. With patients admitted under a coordinated orthogeriatrics care model or a geriatrics-led care model, there is a statistically significant decrease in time to surgery (P = 0.045), length of stay (P = 0.0036), and postoperative mortality rates (P = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Although a heterogeneous group of studies, the aggregate data from several studies using an orthogeriatrics care model or a geriatrics-led care model trend toward improvements across several clinical and cost-related outcome measures: decreased time to surgery, shorter length of stay, improved postoperative clinical outcomes, decreased mortality, and lower cost.
|
Authors | Jay N Patel, David S Klein, Swathy Sreekumar, Frank A Liporace, Richard S Yoon |
Journal | The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
(J Am Acad Orthop Surg)
Vol. 28
Issue 3
Pg. 128-133
(Feb 01 2020)
ISSN: 1940-5480 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 31977613
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Systematic Review)
|
Topics |
- Geriatrics
- Hip Fractures
(mortality, surgery)
- Humans
- Length of Stay
- Patient Care Team
- Patient Readmission
- Time-to-Treatment
|