Background: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk Stratification System for differentiated
thyroid cancer (DTC) is designed to predict recurring/persisting disease but not survival. Earlier studies evaluating this system evaluated the 2009 edition, comprised a low number of patients with ATA high-risk, had low numbers of patients with
follicular thyroid cancer (
FTC), or did not distinguish between papillary and
FTC. Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic value of the 2015 ATA Risk Stratification System in a large population of high-risk
thyroid cancer patients, which included a substantial proportion of
FTC patients. Methods: We retrospectively studied adult patients with DTC who were diagnosed and/or treated at a Dutch university hospital between January 2002 and December 2015. All patients fulfilled the 2015 ATA high-risk criteria. Overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effects of DTC subtype and ATA high-risk criteria on response to
therapy, recurrence, as well as survival. Results: We included 236 patients with high-risk DTC (32%
FTC) with a mean age of 56 years. Median follow-up was 6 years. At final follow-up, 69 patients (29%) had excellent response, while 120 (51%) had structural disease. All high-risk criteria, except large pathologic lymph nodes, were inversely related to excellent response and positively related to structural disease at final follow-up. During follow-up, 14% of the 79 patients who achieved excellent response developed a recurrence. Finally, 10-year DSS was much higher in the initial excellent response than in the initial structural disease group (100% vs. 61%, respectively). Conclusions: In a population of high-risk DTC patients harboring a large subset of
FTC patients, the 2015 ATA Risk Stratification System is not only an excellent predictor of persisting disease but also of survival. As much as 14% of the high-risk patients who had an excellent response upon dynamic risk stratification experienced a recurrence during follow-up. Clinicians should thus be aware of the relatively high recurrence risk in these patients, even after an excellent response to
therapy.