HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Urgent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Under a Minimalist Strategy.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
Urgent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with worse short-term outcomes compared with elective TAVR; however, little is known about long-term outcomes or the safety of the minimalist strategy in this setting. This study investigated the short-term and long-term outcomes of urgent TAVR compared with elective TAVR under a minimalist strategy (transfemoral [TF] approach with conscious sedation and no transesophageal echocardiography guidance).
METHODS:
After excluding 2 emergent patients requiring immediate procedures, a total of 474 consecutive patients underwent elective TF-TAVR (396 patients; 83.6%) or urgent TF-TAVR (78 patients; 16.4%). Urgent TAVR was defined as a procedure performed in the same hospitalization in patients emergently admitted due to cardiac arrest, severe acute decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, or repeated syncopal episodes.
RESULTS:
A minimalist approach was used in 77 patients (98.7%) undergoing urgent TAVR and in 392 patients (99.0%) undergoing elective TAVR (P=.59). Urgent TAVR had similar procedure-related complications, such as stroke, myocardial infarction, bleeding or vascular complications, and in-hospital mortality compared with elective TAVR (mortality, 1.3% vs 0.8%; P=.51) with no intraprocedural cross-over from conscious sedation to general anesthesia. However, 30-day and 1-year survival rates were reduced in patients undergoing urgent TAVR. After adjustment with baseline and procedural factors, urgent TAVR remained significantly predictive of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-4.23; P=.01).
CONCLUSIONS:
Urgent minimalist TAVR can be safely performed with favorable in-hospital outcomes, while increased 30-day and 1-year mortality rates suggest the importance of appropriate diagnosis and timely treatment of severe aortic stenosis.
AuthorsYasuhiro Ichibori, Jun Li, Toral Patel, Jerry Lipinski, Thomas Ladas, Petar Saric, Daniel Kobe, Takahiro Tsushima, Matthew Peters, Sandeep Patel, Angela Davis, Alan H Markowitz, Hiram G Bezerra, Marco A Costa, Ankur Kalra, Guilherme F Attizzani
JournalThe Journal of invasive cardiology (J Invasive Cardiol) Vol. 31 Issue 2 Pg. E30-E36 (02 2019) ISSN: 1557-2501 [Electronic] United States
PMID30700628 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Topics
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve (diagnostic imaging, surgery)
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis (diagnosis, mortality, surgery)
  • Cardiac Catheterization (methods)
  • Echocardiography, Transesophageal
  • Elective Surgical Procedures (methods)
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hospital Mortality (trends)
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (methods)
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States (epidemiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: