HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

AbstractPURPOSE:
The administration timing of antiemetic and chemotherapeutic regimens is often determined by regulatory indications, based on registration studies. Oral NEPA, fixed combination of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA) netupitant and the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 RA (5-HT3RA) palonosetron, is recommended to be administered approximately 60 min before chemotherapy. Reducing chair time for chemotherapy administration at oncology day therapy units would improve facility efficiency without compromising patient symptom management. The objective was to determine if oral NEPA can be administered closer to chemotherapy initiation without compromising patient symptom management.
METHODS:
NK1 receptor occupancy (NK1RO) time course in the brain was determined using positron emission tomography; netupitant and palonosetron plasma concentration-time profiles were described by pharmacokinetic (PK) models; and the rate, extent, and duration of RO by netupitant and palonosetron were predicted by pharmacodynamic modeling. Clinical efficacy data from a pivotal study in cisplatin and oral NEPA-receiving patients were reviewed in the context of symptom management.
RESULTS:
Striatal 90% NK1RO, assumed to correlate with NK1RA antiemetic efficacy, was predicted at netupitant plasma concentration of 225 ng/mL, reached at 2.23 h following NEPA administration. Palonosetron 90% 5-HT3RO was predicted at a 188-ng/L plasma concentration, reached at 1.05 h postdose. The mean time to first treatment failure for the 1.5% of NEPA-treated patients without complete response receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy was 8 h. Antiemetic efficacy was sustained over 5 days despite the expected decrease of NK1RO and 5-HT3RO.
CONCLUSIONS:
Results suggest that administering oral NEPA closer to initiation of cisplatin administration would provide similar antiemetic efficacy. Prospective clinical validation is required.
AuthorsSally Baron-Hay, Matti Aapro, Alberto Bernareggi, Lee Schwartzberg
JournalSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (Support Care Cancer) Vol. 27 Issue 4 Pg. 1309-1317 (Apr 2019) ISSN: 1433-7339 [Electronic] Germany
PMID30685793 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Antiemetics
  • Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
  • Pyridines
  • Palonosetron
  • netupitant
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Antiemetics (administration & dosage, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics)
  • Chemoprevention (methods)
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Induction Chemotherapy (adverse effects)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nausea (chemically induced, prevention & control)
  • Neoplasms (drug therapy, epidemiology, metabolism)
  • Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists (administration & dosage, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics)
  • Palonosetron (administration & dosage, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics)
  • Pyridines (administration & dosage, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vomiting (chemically induced, prevention & control)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: